Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28546648›Full record

ArticleThe Psychological record2017

Differences in Delay, but not Probability Discounting, in Current Smokers, E-cigarette Users, and Never Smokers.

Wojciech Białaszek, Przemysław Marcowski, David J Cox

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Psychological record, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Increased Risky Choice and ReducedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Wojciech BiałaszekSWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Chodakowska 19/31, 03-815 Warsaw, Poland.
Przemysław MarcowskiSWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Chodakowska 19/31, 03-815 Warsaw, Poland.
David J CoxUniversity of Florida, + 945 Center Drive, Gainesville, FL 32611-2250 USA.
Uniwersytet SWPS · PLUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Steeper delay discounting in substance abuse populations, compared to non-abusing populations, has been well-established in prior studies. Despite the growing interest in e-cigarettes as a novel and relatively understudied form of nicotine consumption, relatively little is known as to how e-cigarette users discount rewards compared to traditional cigarette smokers and never smokers. In the present study, we measured delay and probability discounting rates, as well as perceived risk inherent to a delayed reward, in current traditional cigarette smokers, e-cigarette users, and never smokers. We found that traditional cigarette smokers and e-cigarette users discounted delayed rewards at a similar rate-and both were steeper than never smokers. However, no differences were observed in probability discounting or in perceived risk inherent in reward delay.

Indexed as

Delay discountingE-cigaretteProbability discountingRisk in delaySmoking

Identifiers

PMID28546648
PMCPMC5422447
OpenAlexW2608668477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.