Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28545956›Full record

SynthesisRadiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology2017

Comparison of particle beam therapy and stereotactic body radiotherapy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and hypothesis-generating meta-analysis.

Alexander Chi, Haiquan Chen, Sijin Wen, Haijuan Yan, Zhongxing Liao

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. ACR-ARS Practice Parameter for the Performance of Proton Beam Therapy.International journal of particle therapy · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexander ChiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, China. Electronic address: achiaz2010@gmail.com.
Haiquan ChenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, China.
Sijin WenDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, West Virginia University, Morgantown, USA. Electronic address: siwen@hsc.wvu.edu.
Haijuan YanDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, West Virginia University, Morgantown, USA.
Zhongxing LiaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
West Virginia University · USFudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CNThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

West Virginia IDEA-CTRU54GM104942 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI Sally Lynn Hodder · 2012 to 2026
$81.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess hypo-fractionated particle beam therapy (PBT)'s efficacy relative to that of photon stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for early stage (ES) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

methodsEligible studies were identified through extensive searches of the PubMed, Medline, Google-scholar, and Cochrane library databases from 2000 to 2016. Original English publications of ES NSCLC were included. A meta-analysis was performed to compare the survival outcome, toxicity profile, and patterns of failure following each treatment.

results72 SBRT studies and 9 hypo-fractionated PBT studies (mostly single-arm) were included. PBT was associated with improved overall survival (OS; p=0.005) and progression-free survival (PFS; p=0.01) in the univariate meta-analysis. The OS benefit did not reach its statistical significance after inclusion of operability into the final multivariate meta-analysis (p=0.11); while the 3-year local control (LC) still favored PBT (p=0.03).

conclusionAlthough hypo-fractionated PBT may lead to additional clinical benefit when compared with photon SBRT, no statistically significant survival benefit from PBT over SBRT was observed in the treatment of ES NSCLC in this hypothesis-generating meta-analysis after adjusting for potential confounding variables.

Indexed as

RadiosurgeryCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDose Fractionation, RadiationHumansLung NeoplasmsNeoplasm StagingPhotonsEarly stageLung cancerParticle beamPBTSBRTStereotactic

Identifiers

PMID28545956
PMCPMC5568119
OpenAlexW2620549955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.