Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28545757›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry2017

A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Family-Focused Treatment and Individual Supportive Therapy for Depression in Childhood and Early Adolescence.

Martha C Tompson, Catherine A Sugar, David A Langer, Joan R Asarnow

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01159041 (Evaluation of Family Focused Treatment for Childhood Depression), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01159041 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluation of Family Focused Treatment for Childhood Depression

TypeinterventionalSponsorBoston University Charles River CampusRan2010 to 2016Enrolled134ConditionsDepressionArmsFamily Focused Treatment (FFT), Individual Treatment (IP)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Psychological Treatments for Depression in Adolescents: More Than Three Decades Later.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  16. Parent and Youth Preferences in the Treatment of Youth Depression.Child psychiatry and human development · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Martha C TompsonBoston University. Electronic address: mtompson@bu.edu.
Catherine A SugarUniversity of California-Los Angeles Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior.
David A LangerBoston University.
Joan R AsarnowUniversity of California-Los Angeles Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior.
University of California, Los Angeles · USBoston University · US

Funding

1/2-Two-Site Evaluation of Family Focused Treatment for Childhood DepressionR01MH082861 · NIMH · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI TOMPSON, MARTHA C. · 2009 to 2013
$2.1M
2/2-Evaluation of Family Focused Treatment for Childhood DepressionR01MH082856 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ASARNOW, JOAN ROSENBAUM · 2009 to 2013
$1.8M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH082856NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH082861
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDespite the morbidity and negative outcomes associated with early-onset depression, few studies have examined the efficacy of psychosocial treatment for depressive disorders during childhood. Integrating family in treatment could have particularly salutary effects during this developmental period. This trial compared immediate posttreatment effects of family-focused treatment for childhood depression (FFT-CD) with those of individual supportive psychotherapy (IP) for children 7 to 14 years old with depressive disorders.

methodChildren were randomized to 15 sessions of FFT-CD (n = 67) or IP (n = 67) over 4 months. The primary treatment outcome was adequate clinical depression response, defined as at least a 50% decrease in score on the Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R). Additional outcomes included patient-centered outcomes (parent- and child-reported treatment satisfaction), remission (defined as CDRS-R score ≤28), change in continuous CDRS-R score, and change in child and parent reports of depressive and non-depressive symptoms and social adjustment.

resultsSignificant improvement was evident across groups for depressive and non-depressive symptoms, global response, and functioning and social adjustment. Compared with children randomized to IP, children randomized to FFT-CD showed higher rates of adequate clinical depression response (77.7% versus 59.9%; number needed to treat = 5.72; odds ratio 2.29; 95% CI 1.001-5.247; t = 1.97, p = .0498). Across treatments, families reported high satisfaction; compared with IP families, FFT-CD families reported greater knowledge and skills for managing depression. There were no significant differences between treatment arms on secondary outcomes.

conclusionResults support the value of psychosocial intervention, emphasize the important role that families play, and highlight the potential for FFT-CD for supporting recovery in children with depression. Clinical trial registration information-Systems of Support Study for Childhood Depression; http://clinicaltrials.gov; NCT01159041.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildDepressive DisorderFamily TherapyFemaleHumansMalePsychotherapySocial SupportTreatment Outcomechildhood depression treatmentfamily-focused therapyinterventionpsychoeducation

Identifiers

PMID28545757
PMCPMC5482237
OpenAlexW2604131039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.