ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2017
Additional value of
Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of primary breast cancers using dedicated breast PET and whole-body PET.Scientific reports · 2020Trial
- [La Radiologia medica · 2026Review
- Value of early metabolic response for predicting axillary pathological complete response during neoadjuvant systemic therapy in triple negative and HER2-amplified breast cancers: impact of tumor subtypes.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025Article
- A review of the association between baseline [ 18 F] fluorodeoxyglucose uptake and axillary pathological complete response in node-positive breast cancer patients: focus on clinical subtypes.Nuclear medicine communications · 2025Review
- Is CT or FDG-PET more useful for evaluation of the treatment response in metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer? a case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- The Value ofMolecular imaging and radionuclide therapy · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background
methods
resultsHundred-five patients were included: 45 TN and 60 HER2-positive tumours. The metabolic response in breast and axilla correlated moderately in TN tumours (r = 0.57) using ∆SUVmax between PET1-PET3 and poorly in HER2-positive tumours (r = 0.49) using SUVmax at PET2. In TN tumours, metabolic breast response predicted pCR well without improvement after adding axillary response (c-index 0.82 versus 0.85, p = 0.63). In HER2-positive tumours, metabolic breast response predicted pCR poorly with improvement after adding axillary response (c-index 0.64 versus 0.72, p = 0.06).
conclusions
trial registrationNTR NTR1797 . Registered 29 May 2009, retrospectively registered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.