Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28545498›Full record

Trial reportTrials2017

Feasibility of a Systematic, Comprehensive, One-to-One Training (SCOOT) program for new scooter users: study protocol for a randomized control trial.

W Ben Mortenson, Sharon Jang, Charlie H Goldsmith, Laura Hurd Clarke, Sandra Hobson, Richelle Emery

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02696213 (Systematic, Comprehensive, One-to-One Training), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02696213 nacompletednot on this map

Systematic, Comprehensive, One-to-One Training (SCOOT) for Scooter Skills: A Feasibility Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of British ColumbiaRan2016 to 2021Enrolled22ConditionsMobility Scooter Skills TrainingArmsSystematic, Comprehensive, One to One Training (SCOOT), Six Week Delay
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

W Ben MortensonThe Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia, T-325-2211 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 2B5, Canada. ben.mortenson@ubc.ca.
Sharon JangGF Strong Rehabilitation Center, 4255 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 2G9, Canada.
Charlie H GoldsmithMary Pack Arthritis Center, 895 West 10th Ave., Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L7, Canada.
Laura Hurd ClarkeUniversity of British Columbia, 1924 West Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z2, Canada.
Sandra HobsonUniversity of Western Ontario, 1201 Western Road, London, ONT, N6G 1H1, Canada.
Richelle EmeryVancouver Coastal Health - Community Care, 520 West 6th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1A1, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CAArthritis Research Centre of Canada · CAGF Strong Rehabilitation Centre · CAVancouver Coastal Health · CAWestern University · CA

Funding

CIHR 340545
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMobility scooters can facilitate community participation among individuals with mobility limitations. However, accidents are a serious concern with scooter use. Scooter training has been recommended to improve safety, but there are currently few validated programs available. Therefore, we developed a Systematic, Comprehensive, One-to-One Training (SCOOT) program for scooter users. We will conduct a study to evaluate the outcomes produced by the provision SCOOT.

methodsThis feasibility study will use a mixed-methods, rater-blinded, randomized control trial, with a two-step wedge design. The study has two arms: an immediate intervention group, which will receive the intervention directly after baseline assessments, and a delayed intervention group, which will receive the intervention after a 6-week period. Forty participants, who will be stratified based on whether or not participants have previously held a driver's license, will be randomly assigned to each arm. The intervention for this study consists of 6 weeks of one-to-one scooter training by an experienced occupational therapist, who will provide training once or twice per week over the 6 weeks. The primary outcome measure is subjective scooter skills, measured using the Wheelchair Skills Test for scooters. Secondary outcomes include objective scooter skills, confidence, mobility, and satisfaction with selected participation activities. Descriptive measures include cognitive status, functional status, hearing, vision, physical accessibility of the home and community, and visual attention and task switching. Qualitative interviews will be conducted with the first ten willing participants from each group to learn about their scooter use and experiences with SCOOT. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will inform a larger randomized control trial. If the intervention is proven to be effective in this larger study, it may have important implications for policy and practice.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02696213 . Registered on 23 February 2016.

Indexed as

Dependent AmbulationMobility LimitationMotor VehiclesBritish ColumbiaFeasibility StudiesHumansMotor SkillsOccupational TherapyPatient Education as TopicPatient SatisfactionResearch DesignSocial BehaviorTask Performance and AnalysisTime FactorsLearningRandomized control trialScooterTraining

Identifiers

PMID28545498
PMCPMC5445361
OpenAlexW2619253259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.