ArticleBMC bioinformatics2017
JED: a Java Essential Dynamics Program for comparative analysis of protein trajectories.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- JEDi: java essential dynamics inspector - a molecular trajectory analysis toolkit.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Dynamics, a Powerful Component of Current and Future in Silico Approaches for Protein Design and Engineering.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Structural Dynamics of Agonist and Antagonist Binding to the Androgen Receptor.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2019Article
- Decomposing Dynamical Couplings in Mutated scFv Antibody Fragments into Stabilizing and Destabilizing Effects.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2017Article
- Statistical Measures to Quantify Similarity between Molecular Dynamics Simulation Trajectories.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEssential Dynamics (ED) is a common application of principal component analysis (PCA) to extract biologically relevant motions from atomic trajectories of proteins. Covariance and correlation based PCA are two common approaches to determine PCA modes (eigenvectors) and their eigenvalues. Protein dynamics can be characterized in terms of Cartesian coordinates or internal distance pairs. In understanding protein dynamics, a comparison of trajectories taken from a set of proteins for similarity assessment provides insight into conserved mechanisms. Comprehensive software is needed to facilitate comparative-analysis with user-friendly features that are rooted in best practices from multivariate statistics.
resultsWe developed a Java based Essential Dynamics toolkit called JED to compare the ED from multiple protein trajectories. Trajectories from different simulations and different proteins can be pooled for comparative studies. JED implements Cartesian-based coordinates (cPCA) and internal distance pair coordinates (dpPCA) as options to construct covariance (Q) or correlation (R) matrices. Statistical methods are implemented for treating outliers, benchmarking sampling adequacy, characterizing the precision of Q and R, and reporting partial correlations. JED output results as text files that include transformed coordinates for aligned structures, several metrics that quantify protein mobility, PCA modes with their eigenvalues, and displacement vector (DV) projections onto the top principal modes. Pymol scripts together with PDB files allow movies of individual Q- and R-cPCA modes to be visualized, and the essential dynamics occurring within user-selected time scales. Subspaces defined by the top eigenvectors are compared using several statistical metrics to quantify similarity/overlap of high dimensional vector spaces. Free energy landscapes can be generated for both cPCA and dpPCA.
conclusionsJED offers a convenient toolkit that encourages best practices in applying multivariate statistics methods to perform comparative studies of essential dynamics over multiple proteins. For each protein, Cartesian coordinates or internal distance pairs can be employed over the entire structure or user-selected parts to quantify similarity/differences in mobility and correlations in dynamics to develop insight into protein structure/function relationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.