ReviewCurrent cardiology reviews2017
Assessing Coronary Blood Flow Physiology in the Cardiac Catheterisation Laboratory.
Review in Current cardiology reviews, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inter-vessel heterogeneity in coronary microvascular dysfunction: A three-vessel physiological assessment.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2026Article
- DNA/RNA Methylation-Driven Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction: Emerging Pathogenic Mechanisms and Therapeutic Opportunities for Heart Failure in Diabetes.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2026Review
- Performance of a Novel Computational Hyperemic Resistance Index Derived from Cardiac CT in Coronary Chronic Syndromes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- The Role of Circulating Biomarkers in Patients with Coronary Microvascular Disease.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Increased perivascular fibrosis and pro-fibrotic cellular transition in intramyocardial blood vessels in myocardial infarction patients.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus · 2024Article
- Endothelin-1-Induced Persistent Ischemia in a Chicken Embryo Model.Bio-protocol · 2024Article
- Links Between Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Myocardial Blood Flow Changes Impacting Adverse Cardiovascular Disease-related Outcomes.Current cardiology reports · 2024Review
- The pressure-derived microvascular resistance reserve and its correlation to Doppler MRR measurement-a proof of concept study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Current Concepts and Future Applications of Non-Invasive Functional and Anatomical Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Atherosclerosis Specific Features in Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD).Biomedicines · 2022Review
- On-pump beating heart versus off-pump myocardial revascularization-a propensity-matched comparison.Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2021Article
- Relationship Between Plasma Total Homocysteine Levels and Mean Corrected TIMI Frame Count in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.International journal of general medicine · 2021Article
- Article
- The Importance of Measuring Coronary Blood Flow for Clinical Decision Making.Current cardiology reviews · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundContemporary management of coronary disease focuses on the treatment of stenoses in the major epicardial vessels. However, myocardial blood flow is known to be contingent on a range of factors in addition to the patency of the epicardial vessels. These include anatomical and physiological factors such as the extent of myocardium supplied by the vessel, systemic blood pressure, the natural variation in vascular tone in response to physiological needs which allows for coronary autoregulation and pathological factors such as the presence of downstream obstruction to flow due to disease of the small coronary vessels or myocardium. The assessment of clinical effectiveness and adequacy of coronary revascularisation requires the ability to comprehensively and accurately assess and measure myocardial perfusion.
conclusionIn this article, we review the current methods of evaluating coronary blood flow and myocardial perfusion in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.