Trial reportClinical trials (London, England)2017
Design of a cluster-randomized minority recruitment trial: RECRUIT.
Trial report in Clinical trials (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using increased trust in medical researchers to increase minority recruitment: The RECRUIT cluster randomized clinical trial.Contemporary clinical trials · 2021Trial
- Preintake attrition among children and adults waiting for trauma-focused treatment.Psychological services · 2026Article
- A systems framework for improving clinical trial recruitment: A literature-informed approach.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Article
- The development and acceptability of an educational and training intervention for recruiters to neonatal trials: the TRAIN project.BMC medical research methodology · 2023Article
- Enrollment of Participants From Marginalized Racial and Ethnic Groups: A Comparative Assessment of the STEADY-PD III and SURE-PD3 Trials.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2023Article
- Reimagining diversity in multiple myeloma clinical trials.Hematological oncology · 2022Article
- Inclusion of Non-English-Speaking Participants in Studies of Parkinson's Disease: A Call to Action.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2022Article
- Moving the Dial Toward Equity in Parkinson's Disease Clinical Research: a Review of Current Literature and Future Directions in Diversifying PD Clinical Trial Participation.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2022Review
- Behavioural approaches to recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a systematic mapping review.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Enhancing Recruitment and Retention of Minority Populations for Clinical Research in Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine: An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2021Article
- Intent-to-treat analysis of cluster randomized trials when clusters report unidentifiable outcome proportions.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2020Article
- Overcoming Barriers to Parkinson Disease Trial Participation: Increasing Diversity and Novel Designs for Recruitment and Retention.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2020Review
- Facilitators and barriers to successful recruitment into a large comparative effectiveness trial: a qualitative study.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2019 · on this mapArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRacial/ethnic minority groups remain underrepresented in clinical trials. Many strategies to increase minority recruitment focus on minority communities and emphasize common diseases such as hypertension. Scant literature focuses on minority recruitment to trials of less common conditions, often conducted in specialty clinics and dependent on physician referrals. We identified trust/mistrust of specialist physician investigators and institutions conducting medical research and consequent participant reluctance to participate in clinical trials as key-shared barriers across racial/ethnic groups. We developed a trust-based continuous quality improvement intervention to build trust between specialist physician investigators and community minority-serving physicians and ultimately potential trial participants. To avoid the inherent biases of non-randomized studies, we evaluated the intervention in the national Randomized Recruitment Intervention Trial (RECRUIT). This report presents the design of RECRUIT. Specialty clinic follow-up continues through April 2017.
methodsWe hypothesized that specialist physician investigators and coordinators trained in the trust-based continuous quality improvement intervention would enroll a greater proportion of minority participants in their specialty clinics than specialist physician investigators in control specialty clinics. Specialty clinic was the unit of randomization. Using continuous quality improvement, the specialist physician investigators and coordinators tailored recruitment approaches to their specialty clinic characteristics and populations. Primary analyses were adjusted for clustering by specialty clinic within parent trial and matching covariates.
resultsRECRUIT was implemented in four multi-site clinical trials (parent trials) supported by three National Institutes of Health institutes and included 50 associated specialty clinics from these parent trials. Using current data, we have 88% power or greater to detect a 0.15 or greater difference from the currently observed control proportion adjusting for clustering. We detected no differences in baseline matching criteria between intervention and control specialty clinics (all p values > 0.17).
conclusionRECRUIT was the first multi-site randomized control trial to examine the effectiveness of a trust-based continuous quality improvement intervention to increase minority recruitment into clinical trials. RECRUIT's innovations included its focus on building trust between specialist investigators and minority-serving physicians, the use of continuous quality improvement to tailor the intervention to each specialty clinic's specific racial/ethnic populations and barriers to minority recruitment, and the use of specialty clinics from more than one parent multi-site trial to increase generalizability. The effectiveness of the RECRUIT intervention will be determined after the completion of trial data collection and planned analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.