Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28545336›Full record

Trial reportClinical trials (London, England)2017

Design of a cluster-randomized minority recruitment trial: RECRUIT.

Barbara C Tilley, Arch G Mainous, Daniel W Smith, M Diane McKee, Rossybelle P Amorrortu, Jennifer Alvidrez, Vanessa Diaz, Marvella E Ford, Maria E Fernandez, Robert A Hauser and 8 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical trials (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Inclusion of Non-English-Speaking Participants in Studies of Parkinson's Disease: A Call to Action.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Overcoming Barriers to Parkinson Disease Trial Participation: Increasing Diversity and Novel Designs for Recruitment and Retention.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Barbara C Tilley1 Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHEALTH), Houston, TX, USA.
Arch G Mainous2 Department of Health Services Research, Management & Policy, College of Public Health & Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Daniel W Smith3 National Crime Victims Research and Treatment Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
M Diane McKee4 Department of Family and Social Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.
Rossybelle P Amorrortu1 Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHEALTH), Houston, TX, USA.
Jennifer Alvidrez5 National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Vanessa Diaz6 Department of Family Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Marvella E Ford7 Department of Public Health Sciences and Cancer Disparities, Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Maria E Fernandez8 Department of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Robert A Hauser9 Departments of Neurology, Molecular Pharmacology and Physiology, College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Carlos Singer10 Department of Neurology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Veronica Landa1 Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHEALTH), Houston, TX, USA.
Aron Trevino11 Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Stacia M DeSantis1 Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHEALTH), Houston, TX, USA.
Yefei Zhang1 Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHEALTH), Houston, TX, USA.
Elvan Daniels12 Cancer Control and Prevention, American Cancer Society, Inc., Atlanta, GA, USA.
Derrick Tabor5 National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Sally W Vernon8 Department of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

A Randomized Recruitment InterventionU24MD006941 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI TILLEY, BARBARA C. · 2011 to 2016
$5.3M
NIMHD NIH HHS U24 MD006941
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRacial/ethnic minority groups remain underrepresented in clinical trials. Many strategies to increase minority recruitment focus on minority communities and emphasize common diseases such as hypertension. Scant literature focuses on minority recruitment to trials of less common conditions, often conducted in specialty clinics and dependent on physician referrals. We identified trust/mistrust of specialist physician investigators and institutions conducting medical research and consequent participant reluctance to participate in clinical trials as key-shared barriers across racial/ethnic groups. We developed a trust-based continuous quality improvement intervention to build trust between specialist physician investigators and community minority-serving physicians and ultimately potential trial participants. To avoid the inherent biases of non-randomized studies, we evaluated the intervention in the national Randomized Recruitment Intervention Trial (RECRUIT). This report presents the design of RECRUIT. Specialty clinic follow-up continues through April 2017.

methodsWe hypothesized that specialist physician investigators and coordinators trained in the trust-based continuous quality improvement intervention would enroll a greater proportion of minority participants in their specialty clinics than specialist physician investigators in control specialty clinics. Specialty clinic was the unit of randomization. Using continuous quality improvement, the specialist physician investigators and coordinators tailored recruitment approaches to their specialty clinic characteristics and populations. Primary analyses were adjusted for clustering by specialty clinic within parent trial and matching covariates.

resultsRECRUIT was implemented in four multi-site clinical trials (parent trials) supported by three National Institutes of Health institutes and included 50 associated specialty clinics from these parent trials. Using current data, we have 88% power or greater to detect a 0.15 or greater difference from the currently observed control proportion adjusting for clustering. We detected no differences in baseline matching criteria between intervention and control specialty clinics (all p values > 0.17).

conclusionRECRUIT was the first multi-site randomized control trial to examine the effectiveness of a trust-based continuous quality improvement intervention to increase minority recruitment into clinical trials. RECRUIT's innovations included its focus on building trust between specialist investigators and minority-serving physicians, the use of continuous quality improvement to tailor the intervention to each specialty clinic's specific racial/ethnic populations and barriers to minority recruitment, and the use of specialty clinics from more than one parent multi-site trial to increase generalizability. The effectiveness of the RECRUIT intervention will be determined after the completion of trial data collection and planned analyses.

Indexed as

Minority GroupsPatient SelectionResearch DesignBiomedical ResearchHealthcare DisparitiesHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicNational Institutes of Health (U.S.)Pilot ProjectsQuality ImprovementReferral and ConsultationUnited Statescluster-randomized trialcontinuous quality improvementintervention mappingMinority recruitmenttrust

Identifiers

PMID28545336
PMCPMC5448312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.