Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28544780›Full record

ReviewOrthopaedic surgery2017

Spinal Metastatic Disease: A Review of the Role of the Multidisciplinary Team.

Mark Curtin, Robert P Piggott, Evelyn P Murphy, Sudarshan Munigangaiah, Joseph F Baker, John P McCabe, Aiden Devitt

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Orthopaedic surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Evidence-based management of metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC): expert recommendations for standardizing care in Spain.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mark CurtinDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University College Hospital Galway, Saolta Hospital Group, Galway, Ireland.
Robert P PiggottDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University College Hospital Galway, Saolta Hospital Group, Galway, Ireland.
Evelyn P MurphyDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University College Hospital Galway, Saolta Hospital Group, Galway, Ireland.
Sudarshan MunigangaiahDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University College Hospital Galway, Saolta Hospital Group, Galway, Ireland.
Joseph F BakerDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University College Hospital Galway, Saolta Hospital Group, Galway, Ireland.
John P McCabeDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University College Hospital Galway, Saolta Hospital Group, Galway, Ireland.
Aiden DevittDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University College Hospital Galway, Saolta Hospital Group, Galway, Ireland.
University Hospital Galway · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Historically, a simple approach centered on palliation was applicable to the majority of patients with metastatic spinal disease. With advances in diagnosis and treatment, a more complicated algorithm has devolved requiring a multidisciplinary approach with institutional commitment and support. We performed a database review including pertinent articles exploring the multidisciplinary management of spinal metastatic disease. The wide variation in clinical presentation and tumor response to treatment necessitates a multidisciplinary approach that integrates the diagnosis and treatment of the cancer, symptom management, and rehabilitation for optimal care of patients with spinal metastases. Advances in the field of radiology have led to earlier and more focused diagnosis of spinal metastasis and acts to guide therapy. Advances in surgical techniques, neurophysiologic monitoring, and anesthetic expertise have allowed surgeons to perform more extensive procedures leading to improved outcomes and reduced morbidity. Radiation oncology input that is essential as external beam radiation therapy can provide significant pain relief. Non-operative measures may include bisphosphonate infusions, management of complications (e.g. hypercalcemia of malignancy), monoclonal antibody infusions, and chemotherapy if indicated in the treatment of the primary malignancy. Input from psychology services is necessary to address the biopsychosocial ramifications of spinal metastasis. Allied health professionals in the form of physiotherapists, social workers, and dieticians also contribute in maximizing patients' quality of life and well-being.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsHumansMental Health ServicesNutritional SupportPalliative CarePatient Care TeamPhysical Therapy ModalitiesSpinal NeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsDiagnosisMetastasisMultidisciplinaryOncologySpine

Identifiers

PMID28544780
PMCPMC6584164
OpenAlexW2617769625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.