Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28544645›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2017

Germline INDELs and CNVs in a cohort of colorectal cancer patients: their characteristics, associations with relapse-free survival time, and potential time-varying effects on the risk of relapse.

Salem Werdyani, Yajun Yu, Georgia Skardasi, Jingxiong Xu, Konstantin Shestopaloff, Wei Xu, Elizabeth Dicks, Jane Green, Patrick Parfrey, Yildiz E Yilmaz and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cell lineage tracing: Methods, applications, and challenges.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Salem WerdyaniDiscipline of Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
Yajun YuDiscipline of Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
Georgia SkardasiDiscipline of Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
Jingxiong XuDepartment of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Konstantin ShestopaloffDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Wei XuDepartment of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Elizabeth DicksClinical Epidemiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
Jane GreenDiscipline of Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
Patrick ParfreyClinical Epidemiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
Yildiz E YilmazDiscipline of Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
Sevtap SavasDiscipline of Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7324-938X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

INDELs and CNVs are structural variations that may play roles in cancer susceptibility and patient outcomes. Our objectives were a) to computationally detect and examine the genome-wide INDEL/CNV profiles in a cohort of colorectal cancer patients, and b) to examine the associations of frequent INDELs/CNVs with relapse-free survival time. We also identified unique variants in 13 Familial Colorectal Cancer Type X (FCCX) cases. The study cohort consisted of 495 colorectal cancer patients. QuantiSNP and PennCNV algorithms were utilized to predict the INDELs/CNVs using genome-wide signal intensity data. Duplex PCR was used to validate predictions for 10 variants. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to test the associations of 106 common variants with relapse-free survival time. Score test and the multivariable Cox proportional hazards models with time-varying coefficients were applied to identify the variants with time-varying effects on the relapse-free survival time. A total of 3486 distinct INDELs/CNVs were identified in the patient cohort. The majority of these variants were rare (83%) and deletion variants (81%). The results of the computational predictions and duplex PCR results were highly concordant (93-100%). We identified four promising variants significantly associated with relapse-free survival time (P < 0.05) in the multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models after adjustment for clinical factors. More importantly, two additional variants were identified to have time-varying effects on the risk of relapse. Finally, 58 rare variants were identified unique to the FCCX cases; none of them were detected in more than one patient. This is one of the first genome-wide analyses that identified the germline INDEL/CNV profiles in colorectal cancer patients. Our analyses identified novel variants and genes that can biologically affect the risk of relapse in colorectal cancer patients. Additionally, for the first time, we identified germline variants that can potentially be early-relapse markers in colorectal cancer.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsINDEL MutationAgedColorectal NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMalePrognosisRecurrenceCNVscolorectal cancerearly-relapse markersgenetic variationmarkers with time-varying effectsrelapse-free survival

Identifiers

PMID28544645
PMCPMC5463068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.