Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28544536›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2017

The prediction models for postoperative overall survival and disease-free survival in patients with breast cancer.

Daichi Shigemizu, Takuji Iwase, Masataka Yoshimoto, Yasuyo Suzuki, Fuyuki Miya, Keith A Boroevich, Toyomasa Katagiri, Hitoshi Zembutsu, Tatsuhiko Tsunoda

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Daichi ShigemizuDepartment of Medical Science Mathematics, Medical Research Institute, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Takuji IwaseDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, Breast Oncology Center, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Masataka YoshimotoYoshimoto Breast Clinic, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasuyo SuzukiFirst Department of Surgery, Sapporo Medical University, School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Fuyuki MiyaDepartment of Medical Science Mathematics, Medical Research Institute, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Keith A BoroevichLaboratory for Medical Science Mathematics, RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama, Japan.
Toyomasa KatagiriDivision of Genome Medicine, Institute for Genome Research, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.
Hitoshi ZembutsuDivision of Genetics, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Tatsuhiko TsunodaDepartment of Medical Science Mathematics, Medical Research Institute, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5439-7918
Tokyo Medical and Dental University · JPFujimoto Dental and Oral Surgery Clinic · JPJapanese Foundation For Cancer Research · JPNational Cancer Centre Japan · JPRIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences · JPSapporo Medical University · JPTokyo Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of this study is to establish a method for predicting overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in breast cancer patients after surgical operation. The gene expression profiles of cancer tissues from the patients, who underwent complete surgical resection of breast cancer and were subsequently monitored for postoperative survival, were analyzed using cDNA microarrays. We detected seven and three probes/genes associated with the postoperative OS and DFS, respectively, from our discovery cohort data. By incorporating these genes associated with the postoperative survival into MammaPrint genes, often used to predict prognosis of patients with early-stage breast cancer, we constructed postoperative OS and DFS prediction models from the discovery cohort data using a Cox proportional hazard model. The predictive ability of the models was evaluated in another independent cohort using Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The KM curves showed a statistically significant difference between the predicted high- and low-risk groups in both OS (log-rank trend test P = 0.0033) and DFS (log-rank trend test P = 0.00030). The models also achieved high AUC scores of 0.71 in OS and of 0.60 in DFS. Furthermore, our models had improved KM curves when compared to the models using MammaPrint genes (OS: P = 0.0058, DFS: P = 0.00054). Similar results were observed when our model was tested in publicly available datasets. These observations indicate that there is still room for improvement in the current methods of predicting postoperative OS and DFS in breast cancer.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateModels, StatisticalPostoperative PeriodPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveBreast cancerdisease-free survivalMammaPrint genesoverall survivalprediction model

Identifiers

PMID28544536
PMCPMC5504310
OpenAlexW2617351863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.