ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine2018
Dynamic enhancer function in the chromatin context.
Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictive modeling of signal-responsive cis-elements in human red blood cell precursors.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- ChIP happens: from biochemical origins to the modern omics toolbox for understanding steroid hormone receptors.The Biochemical journal · 2026Review
- Calcium channel-coupled transcription factors facilitate direct nuclear signaling.Research square · 2025Article
- Repeated fasting events sensitize enhancers, transcription factor activity and gene expression to support augmented ketogenesis.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- LXR-dependent enhancer activation regulates the temporal organization of the liver's response to refeeding leading to lipogenic gene overshoot.PLoS biology · 2024Article
- Integrative approaches based on genomic techniques in the functional studies on enhancers.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Review
- From the membrane to the nucleus: mechanical signals and transcription regulation.Biophysical reviews · 2023Review
- Advances in targeting 'undruggable' transcription factors with small molecules.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2021Review
- Power-law behavior of transcription factor dynamics at the single-molecule level implies a continuum affinity model.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- An intrinsically disordered region-mediated confinement state contributes to the dynamics and function of transcription factors.Molecular cell · 2021Article
- Interplay among ATP-Dependent Chromatin Remodelers Determines Chromatin Organisation in Yeast.Biology · 2020Review
- Distinct IL-1α-responsive enhancers promote acute and coordinated changes in chromatin topology in a hierarchical manner.The EMBO journal · 2020Article
- The Three Ds of Transcription Activation by Glucagon: Direct, Delayed, and Dynamic.Endocrinology · 2018Review
- Synergistic gene expression during the acute phase response is characterized by transcription factor assisted loading.Nature communications · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Enhancers serve as critical regulatory elements in higher eukaryotic cells. The characterization of enhancer function has evolved primarily from genome-wide methodologies, including chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP-seq), DNase-I hypersensitivity (DNase-seq), digital genomic footprinting (DGF), and the chromosome conformation capture techniques (3C, 4C, and Hi-C). These population-based assays average signals across millions of cells and lead to enhancer models characterized by static and sequential binding. More recently, fluorescent microscopy techniques, including fluorescence recovery after photobleaching, fluorescence correlation spectroscopy, and single molecule tracking (SMT), reveal a highly dynamic binding behavior for these factors in live cells. Furthermore, a refined analysis of genomic footprinting suggests that many transcription factors leave minimal or no footprints in chromatin, even when present and active in a given cell type. In this study, we review the implications of these new approaches for an accurate understanding of enhancer function in real time. In vivo SMT, in particular, has recently evolved as a promising methodology to probe enhancer function in live cells. Integration of findings from the many approaches now employed in the study of enhancer function suggest a highly dynamic view for the action of enhancer activating factors, viewed on a time scale of milliseconds to seconds, rather than minutes to hours. WIREs Syst Biol Med 2018, 10:e1390. doi: 10.1002/wsbm.1390 This article is categorized under: Analytical and Computational Methods > Computational Methods Laboratory Methods and Technologies > Genetic/Genomic Methods Laboratory Methods and Technologies > Imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.