Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28544511›Full record

ArticleInternational forum of allergy & rhinology2017

Computational fluid dynamics evaluation of posterior septectomy as a viable treatment option for large septal perforations.

Bradley A Otto, Chengyu Li, Alexander A Farag, Benjamin Bush, Jillian P Krebs, Ryan D Hutcheson, Kanghyun Kim, Bhakthi Deshpande, Kai Zhao

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International forum of allergy & rhinology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Surgical repair of large nasal septal perforation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A CFD approach to understand nasoseptal perforations.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Modeling congenital nasal pyriform aperture stenosis using computational fluid dynamics.International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bradley A OttoDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Chengyu LiDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Alexander A FaragDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Benjamin BushDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Jillian P KrebsDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Ryan D HutchesonDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Kanghyun KimDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Bhakthi DeshpandeDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Kai ZhaoDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.

Funding

Objective evaluation of conductive olfactory losses & nasal obstruction symptomsR01DC013626 · NIDCD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ZHAO, KAI · 2015 to 2018
$1.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013626
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNumerous surgical techniques exist to treat nasal septal perforation (NSP). The surgical closure of large NSPs (>2 cm) is still challenging. Posterior septectomy has been reported as a simple alternative to treat large NSP, yet its mechanisms for symptom relief are not clear, and if failed, its consequence cannot be easily reversed.

methodsTen NSP patients were recruited: 5 underwent posterior septectomy and 5 underwent conventional flap or button repair. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulated the nasal aerodynamics based on computed tomography (CT) scans. All patients had preoperative CT; however, only 4 had postoperative CT: 2 underwent posterior septectomy and the other 2 underwent flap repair. We examined surgical outcomes and the nasal airflow features among the 2 treatment options.

resultsBoth groups of patients had good outcomes based on chart review. Patients undergoing septectomy had significantly larger perforation size (2.32 ± 0.87 vs 1.21 ± 0.60 cm), higher flow rate across the perforation (47.8 ± 28.6 vs 18.3 ± 12.2 mL/second), and higher wall shear stress (WSS) along the posterior perforation margin (1.39 ± 0.52 vs 1.15 ± 0.58 Pa). The posterior WSS significantly correlated with crossover flow velocity (r = 0.77, p = 0.009) and was reduced by almost 67% postseptectomy, and by 29% postrepair.

conclusionThis is the first CFD analysis on an NSP patient cohort. NSP resulted in flow disturbance and increased WSS that potentially led to symptomatology. The removal of high stress points along the posterior margin may explain why posterior septectomy can be an effective treatment option. Aerodynamic abnormalities, in addition to perforation size and location, could serve as basis for future treatment decisions.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyHydrodynamicsPlastic Surgery ProceduresAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNasal Septal PerforationNasal SeptumSurgical FlapsTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeCFDcomputational fluid dynamicsnasal airflownasal septal perforationNSP

Identifiers

PMID28544511
PMCPMC5654740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.