Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28544481›Full record

ArticleHuman mutation2017

Matching phenotypes to whole genomes: Lessons learned from four iterations of the personal genome project community challenges.

Binghuang Cai, Biao Li, Nikki Kiga, Janita Thusberg, Timothy Bergquist, Yun-Ching Chen, Noushin Niknafs, Hannah Carter, Collin Tokheim, Violeta Beleva-Guthrie and 30 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human mutation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

40 authors.

Binghuang CaiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics & Medical Education, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.
Biao LiThe Buck Institute for Research on Aging, Novato, California.
Nikki KigaDepartment of Biomedical Informatics & Medical Education, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.
Janita ThusbergThe Buck Institute for Research on Aging, Novato, California.
Timothy BergquistDepartment of Biomedical Informatics & Medical Education, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.
Yun-Ching ChenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Noushin NiknafsDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Hannah CarterDepartment of Medicine, Division of Medical Genetics, Institute for Genomic Medicine and Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, Califonia.
Collin TokheimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Violeta Beleva-GuthrieDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Christopher DouvilleDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Rohit BhattacharyaDepartment of Computer Science, Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Hui Ting Grace YeoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Jean FanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Sohini SenguptaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Dewey KimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Melissa ClineDepartment of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, California.
Tychele TurnerMcKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Mark DiekhansDepartment of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, California.
Jan ZauchaDepartment of Computer Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Lipika R PalInstitute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, University of Maryland, Rockville, Maryland.
Chen CaoInstitute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, University of Maryland, Rockville, Maryland.
Chen-Hsin YuInstitute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, University of Maryland, Rockville, Maryland.
Yizhou YinInstitute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, University of Maryland, Rockville, Maryland.
Marco CarraroDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Manuel GiolloDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Carlo FerrariDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Emanuela LeonardiDepartment of Woman and Child Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Silvio C E TosattoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4525-7793
Jason BobePersonalGenomes.org, Boston, Massachusetts.
Madeleine BallPersonalGenomes.org, Boston, Massachusetts.
Roger A HoskinsDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California.
Susanna RepoEuropean Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, UK.
George ChurchPersonalGenomes.org, Boston, Massachusetts.
Steven E BrennerDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California.
John MoultInstitute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, University of Maryland, Rockville, Maryland.
Julian GoughBristol Centre for Complexity Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Mario StankeInstitute of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Rachel KarchinDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Sean D MooneyDepartment of Biomedical Informatics & Medical Education, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.ORCID 0000-0003-2654-0833

Funding

Transform Dissemination and Implementation Science in CTSA ProgramsUL1TR002319 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI John K. Amory · 2017 to 2026
$100.0M
Institute of Translational Health SciencesUL1TR000423 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DISIS, MARY L. · 2012 to 2016
$49.4M
Informatic Profiling of Clinically Relevant MutationR01LM009722 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MOONEY, SEAN DAVID · 2007 to 2014
$3.5M
Community Platform for Data Wrangling of Gene and Genetic Variant AnnotationsU01HG008473 · NHGRI · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI WU, CHUNLEI · 2015 to 2017
$1.9M
Component 2 - Resource ProjectU41HG007346 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI BRENNER, STEVEN E · 2015 to 2017
$1.7M
A computational framework for predicting the impact of mutations in autismR01MH105524 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI IAKOUCHEVA, LILIA M, RADIVOJAC, PREDRAG · 2014 to 2016
$1.4M
Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation ConferenceR13HG006650 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI BRENNER, STEVEN E · 2011 to 2018
$165k
Integrative approach for predicting cancer driver genesF31CA200266 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI TOKHEIM, COLLIN · 2015 to 2017
$131k
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G022771/1NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000423NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002319NCI NIH HHS F31 CA200266NHGRI NIH HHS R13 HG006650NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG008473NHGRI NIH HHS U41 HG007346NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH105524NLM NIH HHS R01 LM009722
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advent of next-generation sequencing has dramatically decreased the cost for whole-genome sequencing and increased the viability for its application in research and clinical care. The Personal Genome Project (PGP) provides unrestricted access to genomes of individuals and their associated phenotypes. This resource enabled the Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation (CAGI) to create a community challenge to assess the bioinformatics community's ability to predict traits from whole genomes. In the CAGI PGP challenge, researchers were asked to predict whether an individual had a particular trait or profile based on their whole genome. Several approaches were used to assess submissions, including ROC AUC (area under receiver operating characteristic curve), probability rankings, the number of correct predictions, and statistical significance simulations. Overall, we found that prediction of individual traits is difficult, relying on a strong knowledge of trait frequency within the general population, whereas matching genomes to trait profiles relies heavily upon a small number of common traits including ancestry, blood type, and eye color. When a rare genetic disorder is present, profiles can be matched when one or more pathogenic variants are identified. Prediction accuracy has improved substantially over the last 6 years due to improved methodology and a better understanding of features.

Indexed as

Area Under CurveGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHuman Genome ProjectHumansPhenotypeQuantitative Trait LociWhole Genome Sequencingbiomedical informaticscommunity challengecritical assessmentgenomegenome interpretationopen consentpersonal genome project (PGP)phenotype

Identifiers

PMID28544481
PMCPMC5645203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.