Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28544128›Full record

ArticlePediatric blood & cancer2017

A pediatric trial of radiation/cetuximab followed by irinotecan/cetuximab in newly diagnosed diffuse pontine gliomas and high-grade astrocytomas: A Pediatric Oncology Experimental Therapeutics Investigators' Consortium study.

Margaret E Macy, Mark W Kieran, Susan N Chi, Kenneth J Cohen, Tobey J MacDonald, Amy A Smith, Michael M Etzl, Michele C Kuei, Andrew M Donson, Lia Gore and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric blood & cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Upfront Biology-Guided Therapy in Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma: Therapeutic, Molecular, and Biomarker Outcomes from PNOC003.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Margaret E MacyDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine/Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6446-9180
Mark W KieranPediatric Neuro-Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Susan N ChiPediatric Neuro-Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Kenneth J CohenDepartment of Pediatrics and Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland.
Tobey J MacDonaldDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta/Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Amy A SmithArnold Palmer Hospital for Children, Orlando, Florida.
Michael M EtzlPhoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona.
Michele C KueiDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
Andrew M DonsonDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
Lia GoreDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine/Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado.
Jennifer DiRenzoDepartment of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Tanya M TrippettDepartment of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Irina OstrovnayaDepartment of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Aru NarendranDepartment of Pediatrics and Oncology, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Canada.
Nicholas K ForemanDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine/Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado.
Ira J DunkelDepartment of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USChildren's Hospital Colorado · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USAlberta Children's Hospital · CAArnold Palmer Hospital for Children · USBoston Children's Hospital · USEmory University · USSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
University of Colorado Cancer Center Support Grant - Lung Cancer Patient-Derived Xenografts with Autologous Human Immune SystemsP30CA046934 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI James V Degregori · 1988 to 2026
$117.0M
Paul Calabresis Award in Clinical Oncology ResearchK12CA086913 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI VIRGINIA F. BORGES, Jill E Slansky · 2000 to 2026
$17.8M
NCI NIH HHS K12 CA086913NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046934
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas (DIPGs) and high-grade astrocytomas (HGA) continue to have dismal prognoses. The combination of cetuximab and irinotecan was demonstrated to be safe and tolerable in a previous pediatric phase 1 combination study. We developed this phase 2 trial to investigate the safety and efficacy of cetuximab given with radiation therapy followed by adjuvant cetuximab and irinotecan.

methodsEligible patients of age 3-21 years had newly diagnosed DIPG or HGA. Patients received radiation therapy (5,940 cGy) with concurrent cetuximab. Following radiation, patients received cetuximab weekly and irinotecan daily for 5 days per week for 2 weeks every 21 days for 30 weeks. Correlative studies were performed. The regimen was considered to be promising if the number of patients with 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) for DIPG and HGA was at least six of 25 and 14 of 26, respectively.

resultsForty-five evaluable patients were enrolled (25 DIPG and 20 HGA). Six patients with DIPG and five with HGA were progression free at 1 year from the start of therapy with 1-year PFS of 29.6% and 18%, respectively. Fatigue, gastrointestinal complaints, electrolyte abnormalities, and rash were the most common adverse events and generally of grade 1 and 2. Increased epidermal growth factor receptor copy number but no K-ras mutations were identified in available samples.

conclusionsThe trial did not meet the predetermined endpoint to deem this regimen successful for HGA. While the trial met the predetermined endpoint for DIPG, overall survival was not markedly improved from historical controls, therefore does not merit further study in this population.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsAstrocytomaBrain Stem NeoplasmsCamptothecinCetuximabChemoradiotherapyChildChild, PreschoolCombined Modality TherapyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGliomaHumansIrinotecanCamptothecinCetuximabIrinotecancetuximabchemotherapydiffuse intrinsic pontine gliomapediatric high-grade astrocytomaradiation

Identifiers

PMID28544128
PMCPMC5605460
OpenAlexW2619920798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.