Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28544100›Full record

Observational studyAcademic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine2017

Undetectable Concentrations of a Food and Drug Administration-approved High-sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Assay to Rule Out Acute Myocardial Infarction at Emergency Department Arrival.

Andrew D McRae, Grant Innes, Michelle Graham, Eddy Lang, James E Andruchow, Yunqi Ji, Shabnam Vatanpour, Tasnima Abedin, Hong Yang, Danielle A Southern and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Contemporary Biomarker Strategies for Patients with Chest Pain.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Andrew D McRaeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta.
Grant InnesDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta.
Michelle GrahamDepartment of Cardiology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta.
Eddy LangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta.
James E AndruchowDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta.
Yunqi JiAlberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta.
Shabnam VatanpourDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta.
Tasnima AbedinAlberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta.
Hong YangDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta.
Danielle A SouthernDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta.
Dongmei WangAlberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta.
Isolde Seiden-LongCalgary Laboratory Services, Calgary, Alberta.
Lawrence DeKoningCalgary Laboratory Services, Calgary, Alberta.
Peter KavsakDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

CIHR MOP‐130316
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe objective of this study was to quantify the sensitivity of very low concentrations of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hsTnT) at ED arrival for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in a large cohort of chest pain patients evaluated in real-world clinical practice.

methodsThis retrospective study included consecutive ED patients with suspected cardiac chest pain evaluated in four urban EDs, excluding those with ST-elevation AMI, cardiac arrest or abnormal kidney function. The primary outcomes were AMI at 7, 30, and 90 days. Secondary outcomes included major adverse cardiac events (MACE; all-cause mortality, AMI, and revascularization) and the individual MACE components. Test characteristics were calculated for hsTnT values from 3 to 200 ng/L .

resultsA total of 7,130 patients met inclusion criteria. AMI incidences at 7, 30, and 90 days were 5.8, 6.0, and 6.2%. When the hsTnT assay was performed at ED arrival, the limit of blank of the assay (3 ng/L) ruled out 7-day AMI in 15.5% of patients with 100% sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV). The limit of detection of the assay (5 ng/L) ruled out AMI in 33.6% of patients with 99.8% sensitivity and 99.95% NPV for 7-day AMI. The limit of quantification (the Food and Drug Administration [FDA]-approved cutoff for lower the reportable limit) of 6 ng/L ruled out AMI in 42.2% of patients with 99.8% sensitivity and 99.95% NPV. The sensitivities of the cutoffs of <3, <5, and <6 ng/L for 7-day MACE were 99.6, 97.4, and 96.6%, respectively. The NPVs of the cutoffs of <3, <5, and <6 ng/L for 7-day MACE were 99.8, 99.5, and 99.4%, respectively. A secondary analysis was performed in a subgroup of 3,549 higher-risk patients who underwent serial troponin testing. In this subgroup, a cutoff of 3 ng/L ruled out 7-day AMI in 9.6% of patients with 100% sensitivity and NPV, a cutoff of 5 ng/L ruled out 7-day AMI in 23.3% of patients with 99.7% sensitivity and 99.9% NPV, and a cutoff of 6 ng/L ruled out 7-day AMI in 29.8% of patients with 99.7 and 99.9% NPV. In the higher-risk subgroup, the sensitivities of cutoffs of <3, <5, and <6 ng/L for 7-day MACE were 99.8, 97.4, and 96.6%, respectively. In this higher-risk subgroup, the NPV of cutoffs of <3, <5, and <6 ng/L for 7-day MACE were 99.7, 98.5, and 98.4%, respectively.

conclusionsWhen used in real-world clinical practice conditions, hsTnT concentrations < 6 ng/L (below the lower reportable limit for an FDA-approved assay) at the time of ED arrival can rule out AMI with very high sensitivity and NPV. The sensitivity for MACE is unacceptably low, and thus a single-troponin rule-out strategy should only be used in the context of a structured risk evaluation.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAgedBiomarkersChest PainEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityTime FactorsTroponin TBiomarkersTroponin T

Identifiers

PMID28544100
PMCPMC5656889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.