Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28544082›Full record

ReviewRespirology (Carlton, Vic.)2017

A resource of potential drug targets and strategic decision-making for obstructive sleep apnoea pharmacotherapy.

Richard L Horner, Kevin P Grace, Andrew Wellman

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Respirology (Carlton, Vic.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Obstructive sleep apnea.Handbook of clinical neurology · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Richard L HornerDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5593-2548
Kevin P GraceInstitute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4746-6353
Andrew WellmanDivision of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Departments of Medicine and Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
University of Toronto · CABrigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

Wakefulness and Forebrain Activation by Orexin NeuronsP01HL095491 · NHLBI · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI WELLMAN, DAVID ANDREW · 2010 to 2019
$25.1M
Understanding the relationship between obesity and tongue fat in humans and ratsP01HL094307 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI PACK, ALLAN I · 2009 to 2020
$23.7M
Validation of a Phenotype Model to Predict Response to Alternative OSA TreatmentsR01HL102321 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI WELLMAN, DAVID ANDREW · 2011 to 2025
$7.3M
Determination of the site of pharyngeal collapse in Obstructive Sleep Apnea patients from snoring soundsR01HL128658 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI WELLMAN, DAVID ANDREW · 2016 to 2025
$4.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL094307NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL095491NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL102321NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL128658
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is currently no pharmacotherapy for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) but there is no principled a priori reason why there should not be one. This review identifies a rational decision-making strategy with the necessary logical underpinnings that any reasonable approach would be expected to navigate to develop a viable pharmacotherapy for OSA. The process first involves phenotyping an individual to quantify and characterize the critical predisposing factor(s) to their OSA pathogenesis and identify, a priori, if the patient is likely to benefit from a pharmacotherapy that targets those factors. We then identify rational strategies to manipulate those critical predisposing factor(s), and the barriers that have to be overcome for success of any OSA pharmacotherapy. A new analysis then identifies candidate drug targets to manipulate the upper airway motor circuitry for OSA pharmacotherapy. The first conclusion is that there are two general pharmacological approaches for OSA treatment that are of the most potential benefit and are practically realistic, one being fairly intuitive but the second perhaps less so. The second conclusion is that after identifying the critical physiological obstacles to OSA pharmacotherapy, there are current therapeutic targets of high interest for future development. The final analysis provides a tabulated resource of 'druggable' targets that are relatively restricted to the circuitry controlling the upper airway musculature, with these candidate targets being of high priority for screening and further study. We also emphasize that a pharmacotherapy may not cure OSA per se, but may still be a useful adjunct to improve the effectiveness of, and adherence to, other treatment mainstays.

Indexed as

Decision MakingDrug DiscoveryHumansPhenotypeSleep Apnea, Obstructiveneurobiologyobstructive sleep apnoeaphenotypesleeptranslational medical research

Identifiers

PMID28544082
PMCPMC5515492
OpenAlexW2618399899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.