Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28543780›Full record

Trial reportJournal of veterinary internal medicine2017

Intranasal Midazolam versus Rectal Diazepam for the Management of Canine Status Epilepticus: A Multicenter Randomized Parallel-Group Clinical Trial.

M Charalambous, S F M Bhatti, L Van Ham, S Platt, N D Jeffery, A Tipold, J Siedenburg, H A Volk, D Hasegawa, A Gallucci and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics of Intranasal Levetiracetam in Healthy Dogs.Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Dogs as a Natural Animal Model of Epilepsy.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 10 institutions in 10 countries.

M CharalambousSmall Animal Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6964-6307
S F M BhattiSmall Animal Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
L Van HamSmall Animal Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
S PlattDepartment of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
N D JefferySmall Animal Department, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
A TipoldDepartment of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
J SiedenburgClinical Department for Small Animals and Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6993-4720
H A VolkDepartment of Clinical Science and Services, Royal Veterinary College, London, UK.
D HasegawaDepartment of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Nippon Veterinary and Life Science University, Tokyo, Japan.
A GallucciDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
G GandiniDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
M MusteataDepartment of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine Iasi, Iasi, Romania.
E IvesDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
A E VanhaesebrouckDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
University of Cambridge · GBGhent University · BEUniversity of Bologna · IT"Ion Ionescu de la Brad" Iasi University of Life Sciences · RONippon Veterinary and Life Science University · JPRoyal Veterinary College · GBTexas College · USUniversity of Georgia · USUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation · DEUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntranasal administration of benzodiazepines has shown superiority over rectal administration for terminating emergency epileptic seizures in human trials. No such clinical trials have been performed in dogs.

objectiveTo evaluate the clinical efficacy of intranasal midazolam (IN-MDZ), via a mucosal atomization device, as a first-line management option for canine status epilepticus and compare it to rectal administration of diazepam (R-DZP) for controlling status epilepticus before intravenous access is available. ANIMALS: Client-owned dogs with idiopathic or structural epilepsy manifesting status epilepticus within a hospital environment were used. Dogs were randomly allocated to treatment with IN-MDZ (n = 20) or R-DZP (n = 15).

methodsRandomized parallel-group clinical trial. Seizure cessation time and adverse effects were recorded. For each dog, treatment was considered successful if the seizure ceased within 5 minutes and did not recur within 10 minutes after administration. The 95% confidence interval was used to detect the true population of dogs that were successfully treated. The Fisher's 2-tailed exact test was used to compare the 2 groups, and the results were considered statistically significant if P < .05.

resultsIN-MDZ and R-DZP terminated status epilepticus in 70% (14/20) and 20% (3/15) of cases, respectively (P = .0059). All dogs showed sedation and ataxia. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: IN-MDZ is a quick, safe and effective first-line medication for controlling status epilepticus in dogs and appears superior to R-DZP. IN-MDZ might be a valuable treatment option when intravenous access is not available and for treatment of status epilepticus in dogs at home.

Indexed as

Administration, IntranasalAdministration, RectalAnimalsAnticonvulsantsDiazepamDog DiseasesDogsFemaleMaleMidazolamStatus EpilepticusAnticonvulsantsDiazepamMidazolamBenzodiazepineDogEmergencyEpileptic seizures

Identifiers

PMID28543780
PMCPMC5508334
OpenAlexW2620467160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.