Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28543736›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2017

A rapid expression and purification condition screening protocol for membrane protein structural biology.

Dan Sjöstrand, Riccardo Diamanti, Camilla A K Lundgren, Benjamin Wiseman, Martin Högbom

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genetically Engineered Cellular Membrane Vesicles as Tailorable Shells for Therapeutics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dan SjöstrandStockholm Center for Biomembrane Research, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, The Arrhenius Laboratories for Natural Sciences, Stockholm, SE-10691, Sweden.
Riccardo DiamantiStockholm Center for Biomembrane Research, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, The Arrhenius Laboratories for Natural Sciences, Stockholm, SE-10691, Sweden.
Camilla A K LundgrenStockholm Center for Biomembrane Research, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, The Arrhenius Laboratories for Natural Sciences, Stockholm, SE-10691, Sweden.
Benjamin WisemanStockholm Center for Biomembrane Research, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, The Arrhenius Laboratories for Natural Sciences, Stockholm, SE-10691, Sweden.
Martin HögbomStockholm Center for Biomembrane Research, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, The Arrhenius Laboratories for Natural Sciences, Stockholm, SE-10691, Sweden.
Stockholm University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Membrane proteins control a large number of vital biological processes and are often medically important-not least as drug targets. However, membrane proteins are generally more difficult to work with than their globular counterparts, and as a consequence comparatively few high-resolution structures are available. In any membrane protein structure project, a lot of effort is usually spent on obtaining a pure and stable protein preparation. The process commonly involves the expression of several constructs and homologs, followed by extraction in various detergents. This is normally a time-consuming and highly iterative process since only one or a few conditions can be tested at a time. In this article, we describe a rapid screening protocol in a 96-well format that largely mimics standard membrane protein purification procedures, but eliminates the ultracentrifugation and membrane preparation steps. Moreover, we show that the results are robustly translatable to large-scale production of detergent-solubilized protein for structural studies. We have applied this protocol to 60 proteins from an E. coli membrane protein library, in order to find the optimal expression, solubilization and purification conditions for each protein. With guidance from the obtained screening data, we have also performed successful large-scale purifications of several of the proteins. The protocol provides a rapid, low cost solution to one of the major bottlenecks in structural biology, making membrane protein structures attainable even for the small laboratory.

Indexed as

Chromatography, AffinityChromatography, GelComputational BiologyEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsGene ExpressionHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysMembrane ProteinsPeptide LibraryRecombinant ProteinsTime FactorsEscherichia coli ProteinsMembrane ProteinsPeptide LibraryRecombinant Proteinsdetergent screeningE. coliFSECGFPIMAC purificationmembrane proteinstructural biology

Identifiers

PMID28543736
PMCPMC5521553
OpenAlexW2618152486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.