Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28542954›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of surgery2017

Population-based study to re-evaluate optimal lymph node yield in colonic cancer.

J C Del Paggio, Y Peng, X Wei, S Nanji, P H MacDonald, C Krishnan Nair, C M Booth

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05572151 (Determining the Optimal Examined Lymph Node for Accurate Staging and Long-term Survival in Rectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05572151 completednot on this map

Determining the Optimal Examined Lymph Node for Accurate Staging and Long-term Survival in Rectal Cancer: a Population Study of the US Database and a Chinese Multi-institutional Registry

TypeobservationalSponsorThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical UniversityRan2009 to 2018Enrolled7,694ConditionsRectal CancerArmslymph node number
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

J C Del PaggioDivision of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's University Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Y PengDivision of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's University Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
X WeiDivision of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's University Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
S NanjiDepartments of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
P H MacDonaldDepartments of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
C Krishnan NairDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Regional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram, India.
C M BoothDivision of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's University Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is well established that lymph node (LN) yield in colonic cancer resection has prognostic significance, although optimal numbers are not clear. Here, LN thresholds associated with both LN positivity and survival were evaluated in a single population-based data set.

methodsTreatment records were linked to the Ontario Cancer Registry to identify a 25 per cent random sample of all patients with stage II/III colonic cancer between 2002 and 2008. Multivariable regression and Cox models evaluated factors associated with LN positivity and cancer-specific survival (CSS) respectively. Optimal thresholds were obtained using sequential regression analysis.

resultsOn adjusted analysis of 5508 eligible patients, younger age (P < 0·001), left-sided tumours (P = 0·003), higher T category (P < 0·001) and greater LN yield (relative risk 0·89, 95 per cent c.i. 0·81 to 0·97; P = 0·007) were associated with a greater likelihood of LN positivity. Regression analyses with multiple thresholds suggested no substantial increase in LN positivity beyond 12-14 LNs. Cox analysis of stage II disease showed that lower LN yield was associated with a significant increase in the risk of death from cancer (CSS hazard ratio range 1·55-1·74; P < 0·001) compared with a greater LN yield, with no significant survival benefit beyond a yield of 20 LNs. Similarly, for stage III disease, a lower LN yield was associated with an increase in the risk of death from cancer (CSS hazard ratio range 1·49-2·20; P < 0·001) versus a large LN yield. In stage III disease, there was no observed LN threshold for survival benefit in the data set.

conclusionThere is incongruity in the optimal LN evaluation for colonic cancer. Although the historically stated threshold of 12 LNs may ensure accurate staging in colonic cancer, thresholds for optimal survival are associated with far greater yields.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge DistributionColonic NeoplasmsEpidemiologic MethodsFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionMaleMiddle AgedOntarioSocioeconomic FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28542954
PMCPMC7938819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.