ArticleThe British journal of surgery2017
Population-based study to re-evaluate optimal lymph node yield in colonic cancer.
Article in The British journal of surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05572151 (Determining the Optimal Examined Lymph Node for Accurate Staging and Long-term Survival in Rectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Determining the Optimal Examined Lymph Node for Accurate Staging and Long-term Survival in Rectal Cancer: a Population Study of the US Database and a Chinese Multi-institutional Registry
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimized workup of lymph nodes in regard to UICC classification of colorectal carcinoma.Histopathology · 2026Article
- Perioperative and Oncological Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer Surgery in Obese Patients: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026Article
- More is not always better: higher lymph node yield is not associated with improved survival in stage I-III colorectal cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Size and number of lymph nodes were risk factors of recurrence in stage II colorectal cancer.BMC cancer · 2023Article
- Is increasing nodal count associated with improved recurrence-free and overall survival following standard right hemicolectomy for colon cancer?Journal of surgical oncology · 2022Article
- Stage II colon cancer staging using the number of retrieved lymph nodes may be superior to current TNM staging for prognosis stratification: the Japanese study group for postoperative follow-up of colorectal cancer.International journal of colorectal disease · 2021Article
- Stage migration resulting from inadequate number of examined lymph nodes impacts prognosis in stage II colon cancer after radical surgery.International journal of colorectal disease · 2021Article
- Recurrence Risk after Radical Colorectal Cancer Surgery-Less Than before, But How High Is It?Cancers · 2020Review
- The adequacy of lymph node clearance in colon cancer surgery performed in a non-specialist centre; implications for practice.Irish journal of medical science · 2020Article
- How does lymph node yield affect survival outcomes of stage I and II colon cancer?World journal of surgical oncology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIt is well established that lymph node (LN) yield in colonic cancer resection has prognostic significance, although optimal numbers are not clear. Here, LN thresholds associated with both LN positivity and survival were evaluated in a single population-based data set.
methodsTreatment records were linked to the Ontario Cancer Registry to identify a 25 per cent random sample of all patients with stage II/III colonic cancer between 2002 and 2008. Multivariable regression and Cox models evaluated factors associated with LN positivity and cancer-specific survival (CSS) respectively. Optimal thresholds were obtained using sequential regression analysis.
resultsOn adjusted analysis of 5508 eligible patients, younger age (P < 0·001), left-sided tumours (P = 0·003), higher T category (P < 0·001) and greater LN yield (relative risk 0·89, 95 per cent c.i. 0·81 to 0·97; P = 0·007) were associated with a greater likelihood of LN positivity. Regression analyses with multiple thresholds suggested no substantial increase in LN positivity beyond 12-14 LNs. Cox analysis of stage II disease showed that lower LN yield was associated with a significant increase in the risk of death from cancer (CSS hazard ratio range 1·55-1·74; P < 0·001) compared with a greater LN yield, with no significant survival benefit beyond a yield of 20 LNs. Similarly, for stage III disease, a lower LN yield was associated with an increase in the risk of death from cancer (CSS hazard ratio range 1·49-2·20; P < 0·001) versus a large LN yield. In stage III disease, there was no observed LN threshold for survival benefit in the data set.
conclusionThere is incongruity in the optimal LN evaluation for colonic cancer. Although the historically stated threshold of 12 LNs may ensure accurate staging in colonic cancer, thresholds for optimal survival are associated with far greater yields.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.