Direct-to-Consumer Medical Testing in the Era of Value-Based Care.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Cost Comparisons of Physician-Ordered Versus Direct-to-Consumer Laboratory Testing.Cureus · 2024
   Article
2. Income-Generating Processes of Free Web-Based Digital Health Tools to Engage Patients: Qualitative Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021
   Article
3. Health and kinship matter: Learning about direct-to-consumer genetic testing user experiences via online discussions.PloS one · 2020
   Article
4. Physician Experience with Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Testing in Kaiser Permanente.Journal of personalized medicine · 2019
   Article
5. Australians' views and experience of personal genomic testing: survey findings from the Genioz study.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2019
   Article
6. Accounting for the Moral Significance of Technology: Revisiting the Case of Non-Medical Sex Selection.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2019
   Article
7. Re-Examining Genetic Screening and Oral Contraceptives: A Patient-Centered Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2019
   Review
8. Genomic Sequencing Expansion and Incomplete Penetrance.Pediatrics · 2019
   Article
9. Attention: Direct-To-Consumer patrons: Proceed with caution.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2018
   Article
10. Genetic Testing in Clinical Settings.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2018
    Review
11. Home self-testing kits: helpful or harmful?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Article
12. Biomarkers in Psychiatry: Ethical Issues.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2018
    Article
13. Trade Agreements and Direct-to-Consumer Advertising of Pharmaceuticals.International journal of health policy and management · 2018
    Article
14. Use of At-Home Medical Tests Among Older US Adults: A Nationally Representative Survey.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Improving Direct-to-Consumer Medical Testing.2017
• Commented on by
  Home self-testing kits: helpful or harmful?2018

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as