Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28542697›Full record

ArticleJAMA ophthalmology2017

Incidence of Atrophic Lesions in Stargardt Disease in the Progression of Atrophy Secondary to Stargardt Disease (ProgStar) Study: Report No. 5.

Rupert W Strauss, Beatriz Muñoz, Alex Ho, Anamika Jha, Michel Michaelides, Saddek Mohand-Said, Artur V Cideciyan, David Birch, Amir H Hariri, Muneeswar G Nittala and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA ophthalmology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01977846 (Natural History of Progression of Atrophy Secondary to Stargardt Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01977846 completednot on this map

Natural History of Progression of Atrophy Secondary to Stargardt Disease: Retrospective, and Prospective Longitudinal Observational Study Incl. Ancillary SMART Study- Scotopic Microperimetric Assessment of Rod Function in Stargardt Disease

TypeobservationalSponsorFoundation Fighting BlindnessRan2013 to 2017Enrolled259ConditionsStargardt Disease
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. ABCA4-associated disease in childhood and adolescence- a phenotype study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Rupert W StraussWilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland2Moorfields Eye Hospital, National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, England3Department of Ophthalmology, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria4Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria5Department of Ophthalmology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Beatriz MuñozWilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Alex HoDoheny Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles).
Anamika JhaDoheny Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles).
Michel MichaelidesMoorfields Eye Hospital, National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, England.
Saddek Mohand-SaidSorbonne Universités, University Pierre et Marie Curie, Université de Paris 06, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale, Centre national de la recherche scientifique, Institut de la Vision, Centre Hospitalier National d'Ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingts, Paris, France.
Artur V CideciyanScheie Eye Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
David BirchRetina Foundation of the Southwest, Dallas, Texas.
Amir H HaririDoheny Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles).
Muneeswar G NittalaDoheny Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles).
SriniVas SaddaDoheny Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles).
Hendrik P N SchollWilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland5Department of Ophthalmology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
ProgStar Study Group
University of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Basel · CHDoheny Eye Institute · USInstitut de la Vision · FRJohns Hopkins University · USNational Health Service · GBPenn Presbyterian Medical Center · USRetina Foundation of the Southwest · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Outcome measures that are sensitive to disease progression are needed as clinical end points for future treatment trials in Stargardt disease. Objective: To examine the incidence of atrophic lesions of the retinal pigment epithelium in patients with Stargardt disease as determined by fundus autofluorescence imaging. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this retrospective multicenter cohort study, 217 patients 6 years and older at baseline at tertiary referral centers in Europe, the United States, and the United Kingdom who were harboring disease-causing variants in the adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-binding cassette subfamily A member 4 (ABCA4) gene and who met the following criteria were enrolled: (1) at least 1 well-demarcated area of atrophy with a minimum diameter of 300 µm, with the total area of all atrophic lesions being less than or equal to 12 mm2 in at least 1 eye at the most recent visit, and (2) fundus autofluorescence images for at least 2 visits with a minimum of 6 months between at least 2 visits. Data were collected between August 22, 2013, and December 12, 2014. Data analysis was performed from March 15, 2015, through January 31, 2017. Exposures: Images were evaluated by staff at a central reading center. Areas of definitely decreased autofluorescence (DDAF) and questionably decreased autofluorescence (QDAF) were outlined and quantified. Lesion-free survival rates were estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Main Outcomes and Measures: Incidence of atrophic lesions as determined by fundus autofluorescence. Results: The 217 patients (mean [SD] age, 21.8 [13.3] years; 127 female [57.5%]; 148 white [68.2%]) contributed 390 eyes for which the mean (SD) follow-up time was 3.9 (1.6) years (range, 0.7-12.1 years). Among eyes without DDAF at first visit, the median time to develop a DDAF lesion was 4.9 years (95% CI, 4.3-5.6 years). Among eyes without QDAF, the median time to develop a QDAF lesion was 6.3 years (95% CI, 5.6-9.7 years). Eyes with a lesion of DDAF at the first visit were less likely to develop a QDAF lesion compared with eyes without a lesion of DDAF (hazard ratio, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.05-0.70; P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance: An estimated 50% of the eyes without DDAF at first visit will develop the lesion in less than 5 years, suggesting that incidence of DDAF could serve as an outcome measure for treatment trials.

Indexed as

ForecastingVisual AcuityDisease ProgressionElectroretinographyEuropeFemaleFluorescein AngiographyFollow-Up StudiesFundus OculiHumansIncidenceMacular DegenerationMaleOphthalmoscopyRetinal Pigment EpitheliumRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID28542697
PMCPMC5710205
OpenAlexW2618137579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.