Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28542349›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in grape.

Ikuko Nakajima, Yusuke Ban, Akifumi Azuma, Noriyuki Onoue, Takaya Moriguchi, Toshiya Yamamoto, Seiichi Toki, Masaki Endo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 207 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Genetic and physiological characteristics ofFrontiers in genome editing · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. CRISPR/Cas as a Genome-Editing Technique in Fruit Tree Breeding.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated editing ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ikuko NakajimaInstitute of Fruit Tree and Tea Science, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, Fujimoto, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Yusuke BanInstitute of Fruit Tree and Tea Science, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, Fujimoto, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Akifumi AzumaInstitute of Fruit Tree and Tea Science, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, Fujimoto, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Noriyuki OnoueInstitute of Fruit Tree and Tea Science, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, Fujimoto, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Takaya MoriguchiInstitute of Fruit Tree and Tea Science, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, Fujimoto, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Toshiya YamamotoInstitute of Fruit Tree and Tea Science, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, Fujimoto, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Seiichi TokiInstitute of Agrobiological Sciences, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, Kannondai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Masaki EndoInstitute of Agrobiological Sciences, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, Kannondai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
National Agriculture and Food Research Organization · JPInstitute of Agrobiological Sciences · JPYokohama City University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNA-guided genome editing using the CRISPR/Cas9 CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats)/Cas9 (CRISPR-associated protein 9) system has been applied successfully in several plant species. However, to date, there are few reports on the use of any of the current genome editing approaches in grape-an important fruit crop with a large market not only for table grapes but also for wine. Here, we report successful targeted mutagenesis in grape (Vitis vinifera L., cv. Neo Muscat) using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. When a Cas9 expression construct was transformed to embryonic calli along with a synthetic sgRNA expression construct targeting the Vitis vinifera phytoene desaturase (VvPDS) gene, regenerated plants with albino leaves were obtained. DNA sequencing confirmed that the VvPDS gene was mutated at the target site in regenerated grape plants. Interestingly, the ratio of mutated cells was higher in lower, older, leaves compared to that in newly appearing upper leaves. This result might suggest either that the proportion of targeted mutagenized cells is higher in older leaves due to the repeated induction of DNA double strand breaks (DSBs), or that the efficiency of precise DSBs repair in cells of old grape leaves is decreased.

Indexed as

MutagenesisBase SequenceCRISPR-Cas SystemsDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA, PlantGenetic VectorsOxidoreductasesPlant LeavesPlant ProteinsPlants, Genetically ModifiedSequence Analysis, DNAVitisDNA, PlantOxidoreductasesphytoene dehydrogenasePlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID28542349
PMCPMC5436839
OpenAlexW2615289176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.