Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28542321›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Early protection events in swine immunized with an experimental live attenuated classical swine fever marker vaccine, FlagT4G.

Lauren G Holinka, Vivian O'Donnell, Guillermo R Risatti, Paul Azzinaro, Jonathan Arzt, Carolina Stenfeldt, Lauro Velazquez-Salinas, Jolene Carlson, Douglas P Gladue, Manuel V Borca

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lauren G HolinkaPlum Island Animal Disease Center, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Greenport, New York, United States of America.
Vivian O'DonnellPlum Island Animal Disease Center, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Greenport, New York, United States of America.
Guillermo R RisattiDepartment of Pathobiology and Veterinary Science, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, United States of America.
Paul AzzinaroPlum Island Animal Disease Center, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Greenport, New York, United States of America.
Jonathan ArztPlum Island Animal Disease Center, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Greenport, New York, United States of America.
Carolina StenfeldtPlum Island Animal Disease Center, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Greenport, New York, United States of America.
Lauro Velazquez-SalinasPlum Island Animal Disease Center, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Greenport, New York, United States of America.
Jolene CarlsonPlum Island Animal Disease Center, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Greenport, New York, United States of America.
Douglas P GladuePlum Island Animal Disease Center, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Greenport, New York, United States of America.
Manuel V BorcaPlum Island Animal Disease Center, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Greenport, New York, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0888-1178

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prophylactic vaccination using live attenuated classical swine fever (CSF) vaccines has been a very effective method to control the disease in endemic regions and during outbreaks in previously disease-free areas. These vaccines confer effective protection against the disease at early times post-vaccination although the mechanisms mediating the protection are poorly characterized. Here we present the events occurring after the administration of our in-house developed live attenuated marker vaccine, FlagT4Gv. We previously reported that FlagT4Gv intramuscular (IM) administered conferred effective protection against intranasal challenge with virulent CSFV (BICv) as early as 7 days post-vaccination. Here we report that FlagT4Gv is able to induce protection against disease as early as three days post-vaccination. Immunohistochemical testing of tissues from FlagT4Gv-inoculated animals showed that tonsils were colonized by the vaccine virus by day 3 post-inoculation. There was a complete absence of BICv in tonsils of FlagT4Gv-inoculated animals which had been intranasal (IN) challenged with BICv 3 days after FlagT4Gv infection, confirming that FlagT4Gv inoculation confers sterile immunity. Analysis of systemic levels of 19 different cytokines in vaccinated animals demonstrated an increase of IFN-α three days after FlagT4Gv inoculation compared with mock infected controls.

Indexed as

AnimalsClassical Swine FeverClassical Swine Fever VirusCytokinesFemaleInterferon-alphaPalatine TonsilSus scrofaSwineTime FactorsVaccines, AttenuatedVaccines, MarkerViral VaccinesVirus ReplicationCytokinesInterferon-alphaVaccines, AttenuatedVaccines, MarkerViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID28542321
PMCPMC5443506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.