ArticleNature neuroscience2017
Toward standard practices for sharing computer code and programs in neuroscience.
Article in Nature neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
58 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Predictive modelling of brain disorders with magnetic resonance imaging: A systematic review of modelling practices, transparency, and interpretability in the use of convolutional neural networks.Human brain mapping · 2023Pooled it
- Molecular correlates of sleep deprivation in the mouse brain identified by meta-analysis of microarray data.Neurobiology of sleep and circadian rhythms · 2026Article
- Review
- Article
- A how-to guide for code sharing in biology.PLoS biology · 2024Review
- SanPy: Software for the analysis and visualization of whole-cell current-clamp recordings.Biophysical journal · 2024Article
- Reproducible machine learning research in mental workload classification using EEG.Frontiers in neuroergonomics · 2024Review
- Analytical code sharing practices in biomedical research.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
- Analytical code sharing practices in biomedical research.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Honey bee (Apis mellifera) wing images: a tool for identification and conservation.GigaScience · 2023Article
- ASAS-NANP symposium: mathematical modeling in animal nutrition-Making sense of big data and machine learning: how open-source code can advance training of animal scientists.Journal of animal science · 2023Article
- TACI: An ImageJ Plugin for 3D Calcium Imaging Analysis.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2022Article
- Why don't we share data and code? Perceived barriers and benefits to public archiving practices.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022Article
- Developing image analysis methods for digital pathology.The Journal of pathology · 2022Review
- International data governance for neuroscience.Neuron · 2022Review
- Scan Once, Analyse Many: Using Large Open-Access Neuroimaging Datasets to Understand the Brain.Neuroinformatics · 2022Article
- From calcium imaging to graph topology.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2022Review
- From P4 medicine to P5 medicine: transitional times for a more human-centric approach to AI-based tools for hospitals of tomorrow.Open research Europe · 2022Article
- CMRSegTools: An open-source software enabling reproducible research in segmentation of acute myocardial infarct in CMR images.PloS one · 2022Article
- Beyond advertising: New infrastructures for publishing integrated research objects.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.