Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28541721›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology2017

A Joint Bayesian Model for Integrating Microarray and RNA Sequencing Transcriptomic Data.

Tianzhou Ma, Faming Liang, Steffi Oesterreich, George C Tseng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Centromere Protein F (Journal of Cancer · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Platform-integrated mRNA isoform quantification.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tianzhou Ma1 Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Faming Liang2 Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida , Gainesville, Florida.
Steffi Oesterreich3 Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
George C Tseng1 Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Funding

Equivalent Partial Correlation Methods for Integrative Genetic Network Analysis R01GM117597 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI LIANG, FAMING · 2015 to 2017
$1.0M
Power calculation and design issues in next-generation sequencingR01CA190766 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI TSENG, GEORGE C. · 2015 to 2018
$876k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA190766NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM117597
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the sequencing cost continued to drop in the past decade, RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) has replaced microarray to become the standard high-throughput experimental tool to analyze transcriptomic profile. As more and more datasets are generated and accumulated in the public domain, meta-analysis to combine multiple transcriptomic studies to increase statistical power has received increasing popularity. In this article, we propose a Bayesian hierarchical model to jointly integrate microarray and RNA-seq studies. Since systematic fold change differences across RNA-seq and microarray for detecting differentially expressed genes have been previously reported, we replicated this finding in several real datasets and showed that incorporation of a normalization procedure to account for the bias improves the detection accuracy and power. We compared our method with the popular two-stage Fisher's method using simulations and two real applications in a histological subtype (invasive lobular carcinoma) of breast cancer comparing PR+ versus PR- and early-stage versus late-stage patients. The result showed improved detection power and more significant and interpretable pathways enriched in the detected biomarkers from the proposed Bayesian model.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, LobularFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansMicroarray AnalysisNeoplasm InvasivenessReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneRNASequence Analysis, RNATranscriptomeBiomarkers, TumorReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneRNABayesian hierarchical modeldifferential expression (DE)meta-analysismicroarraynormalizationRNA sequencing (RNA-seq).

Identifiers

PMID28541721
PMCPMC5510692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.