Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28541641›Full record

ReviewJournal of gynecologic oncology2017

Update on rare epithelial ovarian cancers: based on the Rare Ovarian Tumors Young Investigator Conference.

Ji Yon Agnes Jang, Nozomu Yanaihara, Eric Pujade-Lauraine, Yoshiki Mikami, Katsutoshi Oda, Michael Bookman, Jonathan Ledermann, Muneaki Shimada, Takako Kiyokawa, Byoung Gie Kim and 9 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Mucinous Cancer of the Ovary: Overview and Current Status.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Ji Yon Agnes JangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Nozomu YanaiharaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. yanazou@jikei.ac.jp.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0160-7085
Eric Pujade-LauraineUnité Cancer de la Femme et Recherche Clinique, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Centre, site Hôtel-Dieu, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France.
Yoshiki MikamiDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan.
Katsutoshi OdaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Michael BookmanUS Oncology Research and Arizona Oncology, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Jonathan LedermannUCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK.
Muneaki ShimadaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tottori University School of Medicine, Yonago, Japan.
Takako KiyokawaDepartment of Pathology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Byoung Gie KimGynecologic Cancer Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0572-8450
Noriomi MatsumuraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Tsunehisa KakuDepartment of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Takafumi KurodaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2659-1449
Yoko NagayoshiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Ayako KawabataDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5220-4409
Yasushi IidaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Jae Weon KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1835-9436
Michael QuinnWomen's Cancer Research Center, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Aikou OkamotoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5079-0464

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been significant progress in the understanding of the pathology and molecular biology of rare ovarian cancers, which has helped both diagnosis and treatment. This paper provides an update on recent advances in the knowledge and treatment of rare ovarian cancers and identifies gaps that need to be addressed by further clinical research. The topics covered include: low-grade serous, mucinous, and clear cell carcinomas of the ovary. Given the molecular heterogeneity and the histopathological rarity of these ovarian cancers, the importance of designing adequately powered trials or finding statistically innovative ways to approach the treatment of these rare tumors has been emphasized. This paper is based on the Rare Ovarian Tumors Conference for Young Investigators which was presented in Tokyo 2015 prior to the 5th Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference of the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG).

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma, Clear CellAdenocarcinoma, MucinousAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialCongresses as TopicCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresFemaleFertility PreservationHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasm GradingNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialOvarian NeoplasmsOvariectomyRare DiseasesAntineoplastic AgentsOvarian NeoplasmsRare Diseases

Identifiers

PMID28541641
PMCPMC5447152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.