ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2017
Rapidly Evolving Toll-3/4 Genes Encode Male-Specific Toll-Like Receptors in Drosophila.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dynamic proteomics of Nasonia vitripennis pupal development reveals testis-specific regulation of new proteins (orphans) likely related to exo-α-sialidases.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- The molecular toll pathway repertoire in anopheline mosquitoes.Developmental and comparative immunology · 2025Article
- The Molecular Toll Pathway Repertoire in Anopheline Mosquitoes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Unveiling the multifaceted role of toll-like receptors in immunity of aquatic animals: pioneering strategies for disease management.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Dynamic Evolution of Bacterial Ligand Recognition by Formyl Peptide Receptors.Genome biology and evolution · 2023Article
- Evolution and assembly ofOpen biology · 2023Article
- Signatures of Adaptation, Constraints, and Potential Redundancy in the Canonical Immune Genes of a Key Pollinator.Genome biology and evolution · 2023Article
- Innate Immune Response ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Hyperpolarization Induced by Lipopolysaccharides but Not by Chloroform Is Inhibited by Doxapram, an Inhibitor of Two-P-Domain KInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Intermolecular Interactions Drive Protein Adaptive and Coadaptive Evolution at Both Species and Population Levels.Molecular biology and evolution · 2022Article
- Article
- Evolution of Toll, Spatzle and MyD88 in insects: the problem of the Diptera bias.BMC genomics · 2021Article
- The Effect of Bacterial Endotoxin LPS on Serotonergic Modulation of Glutamatergic Synaptic Transmission.Biology · 2020Article
- The effects of bacterial endotoxin LPS on synaptic transmission at the neuromuscular junction.Heliyon · 2019Article
- Gypsy moth genome provides insights into flight capability and virus-host interactions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019Article
- Nature of selection varies on different domains of IFI16-like PYHIN genes in ruminants.BMC evolutionary biology · 2019Article
- Sexual Dimorphisms in Innate Immunity and Responses to Infection inFrontiers in immunology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Animal Toll-like receptors (TLRs) have evolved through a pattern of duplication and divergence. Whereas mammalian TLRs directly recognize microbial ligands, Drosophila Tolls bind endogenous ligands downstream of both developmental and immune signaling cascades. Here, we find that most Toll genes in Drosophila evolve slowly with little gene turnover (gains/losses), consistent with their important roles in development and indirect roles in microbial recognition. In contrast, we find that the Toll-3/4 genes have experienced an unusually rapid rate of gene gains and losses, resulting in lineage-specific Toll-3/4s and vastly different gene repertoires among Drosophila species, from zero copies (e.g., D. mojavensis) to nineteen copies (e.g., D. willistoni). In D. willistoni, we find strong evidence for positive selection in Toll-3/4 genes, localized specifically to an extracellular region predicted to overlap with the binding site of Spätzle, the only known ligand of insect Tolls. However, because Spätzle genes are not experiencing similar selective pressures, we hypothesize that Toll-3/4s may be rapidly evolving because they bind to a different ligand, akin to TLRs outside of insects. We further find that most Drosophila Toll-3/4 genes are either weakly expressed or expressed exclusively in males, specifically in the germline. Unlike other Toll genes in D. melanogaster, Toll-3, and Toll-4 have apparently escaped from essential developmental roles, as knockdowns have no substantial effects on viability or male fertility. Based on these findings, we propose that the Toll-3/4 genes represent an exceptionally rapidly evolving lineage of Drosophila Toll genes, which play an unusual, as-yet-undiscovered role in the male germline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.