ArticleNature2017
Medical research: Personalized test tracks cancer relapse.
Article in Nature, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineering Precision Medicine.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2019Review
- Personalized treatment options for thyroid cancer: current perspectives.Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2019Review
- Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the era of personalized cancer therapy.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2018Review
- Comparison of circulating DNA from plasma and urine for EGFR mutations in NSCLC patients.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2018Article
- Liquid dynamic medicine and N-of-1 clinical trials: a change of perspective in oncology research.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2017Review
- Circulating tumor DNA for personalized lung cancer monitoring.BMC medicine · 2017Article
- Correction.Nature · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
- Erratum issuedCorrection.2017
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28541318What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.