Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28541137›Full record

ReviewDiabetes technology & therapeutics2017

Clinical Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes.

Anders L Carlson, Deborah M Mullen, Richard M Bergenstal

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diabetes technology & therapeutics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 82 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04667728 nacompletednot on this map

The Effects of Professional Continuous Glucose Monitoring as an Adjuvant Educational Tool in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Poor Glycemic Control

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstituto de Seguridad y Servicios Sociales de los Trabajadores del EstadoRan2017 to 2017Enrolled302ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2ArmsProfessional continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) sensor (iPro™2)
NCT07371546 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) in Prediabetes: A Mixed-Methods Study Exploring Behavioural Impact, Patient Experiences and Provider Perspectives

TypeinterventionalSponsorSingHealth PolyclinicsRan2025 to 2026Enrolled76ConditionsPre-diabetesArmsContinuous Glucose Monitoring
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 174 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anders L CarlsonInternational Diabetes Center , Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Deborah M MullenInternational Diabetes Center , Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Richard M BergenstalInternational Diabetes Center , Minneapolis, Minnesota.
International Diabetes Federation · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHemoglobin A1c is an excellent population health measure for the risk of vascular complications in diabetes, while continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is a tool to help personalize a diabetes treatment plan. The value of CGM in individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) has been well demonstrated when compared with utilizing self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) to guide treatment decisions. CGM is a tool for patients and clinicians to visualize the important role that diet, exercise, stress management, and the appropriate selection of diabetes medications can have in managing type 2 diabetes (T2D). Several diabetes organizations have recently reviewed the literature on the appropriate use of CGM in diabetes management and concluded CGM may be a useful educational and management tool particularly for patients on insulin therapy. The indications for using CGM either as a clinic-based loaner distribution model for intermittent use (professional CGM) or a CGM system owned by the patient and used at home with real-time glucose reading (personal CGM) are only beginning to be addressed in T2D. Most summaries of CGM studies conclude that having a standardized glucose pattern report, such as the ambulatory glucose profile (AGP) report, should help facilitate effective shared decision-making sessions. The future of CGM indications for the use of CGM is evolving rapidly. In some instances, CGM is now approved for making medication adjustments without SMBG confirmation and it appears that some forms of CGM will be approved for use in the Medicare population in the United States in the near future. Many individuals with T1D and T2D and their care teams will come to depend on CGM as a key tool for diabetes management.

Indexed as

AdultBlood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinMaleBlood GlucoseGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humanHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinContinuous glucose monitoringProfessional useType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID28541137
PMCPMC5444486
OpenAlexW2618217557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.