Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28541092›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of sports medicine2017

Amniotic Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Exhibit Preferential Osteogenic and Chondrogenic Differentiation and Enhanced Matrix Production Compared With Adipose Mesenchymal Stromal Cells.

Natasha Topoluk, Richard Hawkins, John Tokish, Jeremy Mercuri

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of sports medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Comparison of miRNA cargo in human adipose-tissueExtracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids · 2021
    Article
  19. Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2020
    Article
  20. Amniotic Product Treatments: Clinical and Basic Science Evidence.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Natasha TopolukDepartment of Bioengineering, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, USA.
Richard HawkinsDepartment of Bioengineering, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, USA.
John TokishDepartment of Bioengineering, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, USA.
Jeremy MercuriDepartment of Bioengineering, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, USA.
Clemson University · USSteadman Clinic · US

Funding

South Carolina IDeA Networks of Biomedical Research (SC INBRE V)P20GM103499 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI EDIE C GOLDSMITH · 2012 to 2026
$61.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103499
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTherapeutic efficacy of various mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) types for orthopaedic applications is currently being investigated. While the concept of MSC therapy is well grounded in the basic science of healing and regeneration, little is known about individual MSC populations in terms of their propensity to promote the repair and/or regeneration of specific musculoskeletal tissues. Two promising MSC sources, adipose and amnion, have each demonstrated differentiation and extracellular matrix (ECM) production in the setting of musculoskeletal tissue regeneration. However, no study to date has directly compared the differentiation potential of these 2 MSC populations. PURPOSE: To compare the ability of human adipose- and amnion-derived MSCs to undergo osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation. STUDY

designControlled laboratory study.

methodsMSC populations from the human term amnion were quantified and characterized via cell counting, histologic assessment, and flow cytometry. Differentiation of these cells in comparison to commercially purchased human adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (hADSCs) in the presence and absence of differentiation media was evaluated via reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for bone and cartilage gene transcript markers and histology/immunohistochemistry to examine ECM production. Analysis of variance and paired t tests were performed to compare results across all cell groups investigated.

resultsThe authors confirmed that the human term amnion contains 2 primary cell types demonstrating MSC characteristics-(1) human amniotic epithelial cells (hAECs) and (2) human amniotic mesenchymal stromal cells (hAMSCs)-and each exhibited more than 90% staining for MSC surface markers (CD90, CD105, CD73). Average viable hAEC and hAMSC yields at harvest were 2.3 × 10

conclusionAmnion-derived MSCs demonstrate a greater differentiation potential toward bone and cartilage compared with hADSCs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Amniotic MSCs may be the source of choice in the regenerative treatment of bone or osteochondral musculoskeletal disease. They show significantly higher yields and better differentiation toward these tissues than MSCs derived from adipose.

Indexed as

Adipose TissueAmnionCalcification, PhysiologicCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedChondrogenesisEpithelial CellsExtracellular MatrixFlow CytometryHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsOsteogenesisadiposebonecartilagedifferentiationorthopaedicsperinatalregenerative medicinestromal cell

Identifiers

PMID28541092
PMCPMC5832055
OpenAlexW2617388544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.