Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28540649›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2017

Myocarditis: A Clinical Overview.

A L P Caforio, G Malipiero, R Marcolongo, S Iliceto

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Brazilian Society of Cardiology Guideline on Myocarditis - 2022.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2022
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Observational
  5. Zinc: a metallic shield against cardiac inflammation.Metallomics : integrated biometal science · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Pediatric Myocarditis: What Have We Learnt So Far?Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

A L P CaforioDivision of Cardiology, Department of Cardiological, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, Centro "V. Gallucci", University of Padova-Policlinico, Via Giustiniani, 2, 35128, Padova, Italy. alida.caforio@unipd.it.
G MalipieroHematology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
R MarcolongoHematology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
S IlicetoDivision of Cardiology, Department of Cardiological, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, Centro "V. Gallucci", University of Padova-Policlinico, Via Giustiniani, 2, 35128, Padova, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewIn this paper we will review the modern diagnostic approach to patients with clinically suspected myocarditis as well as the treatment modalities and strategy in light of up-to-date clinical experience and scientific evidence. RECENT

findingsRapidly expanding evidence suggests that myocardial inflammation is frequently underdiagnosed or overlooked in clinical practice, although new therapeutic options have been validated. Moreover, the available evidence suggests that subclinical cardiac involvement has negative prognostic impact on morbidity and mortality and should be actively investigated and adequately treated. Myocarditis represents a growing challenge for physicians, due to increased referral of patients for endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) or cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), and requires a highly integrated management by a team of caring physicians.

Indexed as

BiopsyCardiac CatheterizationHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMyocarditisImmunosuppressive therapyMyocarditisSystemic immune-mediated disease

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.