ArticleClinical rheumatology2017
Treatment response to etanercept in methotrexate refractory juvenile idiopathic arthritis: an analysis of predictors and long-term outcomes.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Treatment Withdrawal Following Remission in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Paediatric drugs · 2019Pooled it
- TAK1 inhibition restores p53 expression and suppresses inflammation and hyperplasia in JIA synovial fibroblasts.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Clinical predictors of relapse and severe disease phenotype in children with non-systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Toward Personalized Withdrawal of TNF-α Inhibitors in Non-Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Predictors of Biologic-Free Remission and Flare.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Discontinuation of biologic DMARDs in non-systemic JIA patients: a scoping review of relapse rates and associated factors.Pediatric rheumatology online journal · 2022Article
- Evaluation of flare rate and reduction strategies for bDMARDs in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: real world data from a single-centre cohort.Rheumatology international · 2022Observational
- Long-term outcomes in patients with polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis receiving adalimumab with or without methotrexate.RMD open · 2020Article
- Biomarkers of Response to Biologic Therapy in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Review
- Enthesitis-related arthritis is the most common category of juvenile idiopathic arthritis in Taiwan and presents persistent active disease.Pediatric rheumatology online journal · 2019Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the study is to evaluate the long-term outcomes, predictors, and the role of inflammatory cytokines in methotrexate (MTx) refractory juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients. This is a retrospective cohort study. MTx refractory JIA patients who received etanercept as their first biological agent in National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH) were enrolled. Patients were classified into remission group, non-remission group, relapsing group, and non-relapsing group according to the criteria of disease remission and disease flares defined by Wallace et al. We compared the differences in the baseline data, therapeutic responses, time to etanercept tapering, and inflammatory cytokine (IL-12p70, TNF-α, IL-10, IL-6, and IL-1β) levels between these groups. Among the 58 patients, 30 (52%) reached remission. Seventeen of the 30 patients had episodes of disease flares. We found that more patients in the remission group achieved ACR pediatric 70 response at the fourth month after etanercept treatment (p < 0.002). When comparing the relapsing group and non-relapsing group, we found that patients were more likely to have disease flares if it took longer to achieve remission (p = 0.0008). Besides, etanercept was tapered earlier in the non-relapsing group (p = 0.0006). There was no significant difference in levels of inflammatory cytokine between groups. No parameter before treatment could be used as a single predictor of long-term outcomes. However, ACR pediatric 70 response at the fourth month after etanercept treatment might predict disease remission. Besides, patients who achieved remission more rapidly were less likely to have disease flares.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28540607What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.