Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28540573›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2017

Optimization of multi-environment trials for genomic selection based on crop models.

R Rincent, E Kuhn, H Monod, F-X Oury, M Rousset, V Allard, J Le Gouis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Optimizing resource allocation inFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  3. Integration of crop modeling and sensing into molecular breeding for nutritional quality and stress tolerance.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Genomic selection in tropical perennial crops and plantation trees: a review.Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2022
    Review
  10. Assessment of genomic prediction reliability and optimization of experimental designs in multi-environment trials.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Integration of Crop Growth Models and Genomic Prediction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

R RincentINRA, UMR 1095 Génétique, Diversité et Ecophysiologie des Céréales, 5 chemin de Beaulieu, 63100, Clermont-Ferrand, France. renaud.rincent@inra.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0885-0969
E KuhnINRA, MaIAGE, INRA, Université Paris-Saclay, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
H MonodINRA, MaIAGE, INRA, Université Paris-Saclay, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
F-X OuryINRA, UMR 1095 Génétique, Diversité et Ecophysiologie des Céréales, 5 chemin de Beaulieu, 63100, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
M RoussetINRA, UMR 1095 Génétique, Diversité et Ecophysiologie des Céréales, 5 chemin de Beaulieu, 63100, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
V AllardINRA, UMR 1095 Génétique, Diversité et Ecophysiologie des Céréales, 5 chemin de Beaulieu, 63100, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
J Le GouisINRA, UMR 1095 Génétique, Diversité et Ecophysiologie des Céréales, 5 chemin de Beaulieu, 63100, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageWe propose a statistical criterion to optimize multi-environment trials to predict genotype × environment interactions more efficiently, by combining crop growth models and genomic selection models. Genotype × environment interactions (GEI) are common in plant multi-environment trials (METs). In this context, models developed for genomic selection (GS) that refers to the use of genome-wide information for predicting breeding values of selection candidates need to be adapted. One promising way to increase prediction accuracy in various environments is to combine ecophysiological and genetic modelling thanks to crop growth models (CGM) incorporating genetic parameters. The efficiency of this approach relies on the quality of the parameter estimates, which depends on the environments composing this MET used for calibration. The objective of this study was to determine a method to optimize the set of environments composing the MET for estimating genetic parameters in this context. A criterion called OptiMET was defined to this aim, and was evaluated on simulated and real data, with the example of wheat phenology. The MET defined with OptiMET allowed estimating the genetic parameters with lower error, leading to higher QTL detection power and higher prediction accuracies. MET defined with OptiMET was on average more efficient than random MET composed of twice as many environments, in terms of quality of the parameter estimates. OptiMET is thus a valuable tool to determine optimal experimental conditions to best exploit MET and the phenotyping tools that are currently developed.

Indexed as

EnvironmentSelection, GeneticBayes TheoremCrops, AgriculturalGenotypeModels, GeneticModels, StatisticalPhenotypePlant BreedingTriticum

Identifiers

PMID28540573
PMCPMC5511605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.