ReviewDer Unfallchirurg2017
[The significance of biofilm for the treatment of infections in orthopedic surgery : 2017 Update].
Review in Der Unfallchirurg, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification and comparison of protein composition of biofilms in response to EGCG fromBiofilm · 2024Article
- Article
- Assessment of the biofilm-forming ability on solid surfaces of periprosthetic infection-associated pathogens.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe increase in endoprosthetic and osteosynthetic surgical treatment is associated with a simultaneous increase in implant-associated infections (surgical site infections, SSI). Biofilms appear to play a significant role in the diagnosis and treatment of these infections and heavily contaminated wounds. This article aims to provide a current overview of biofilm and its relevance in orthopedic surgery. MATERIALS AND
methodsA computer-assisted literature search of MedLine (PubMed) was performed using key word combinations with "biofilm" (as of March 2017).
resultsBiofilm, a polymicrobial organization and life form surrounded by a polysaccharide matrix, refers to an adaptation strategy of bacteria in unfavorable living conditions (e. g. under antibiotic therapy). Biofilms can develop after 6 h in highly contaminated wounds. In acute and chronic infections, biofilms can occur in 30-80 % of the cases. Only planktonic bacteria (high metabolic activity, cultivable) can be detected in standard microbiological cultures, biofilms, however, cannot. Molecular microscopic methods, such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), enable the detection of bacteria in biofilms. The core concepts of anti-biofilm therapy include the prevention of biofilm and early surgical debridement, followed by the local and/or systemic administration of antibiotics as well as the local application of antiseptics.
conclusionsThe development of biofilm should be anticipated in strongly contaminated wounds as well as in acute and chronic infection sites. The best strategy to combat biofilms is to prevent their development. Standard microbiological culture methods do not enable the detection of biofilm. Therefore, the implementation of molecular biological detection methods (z. B. FISH) is important. Further anti-biofilm strategies are being investigated experimentally, but there are no real options for clinical use as of yet.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.