Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28540435›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2017

Validation of the Child HCAHPS survey to measure pediatric inpatient experience of care in Flanders.

Luk Bruyneel, Ellen Coeckelberghs, Gunnar Buyse, Kristina Casteels, Barbara Lommers, Jo Vandersmissen, Johan Van Eldere, Chris Van Geet, Kris Vanhaecht

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Luk BruyneelInstitute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium. luk.bruyneel@med.kuleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1209-692X
Ellen CoeckelberghsInstitute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Gunnar BuyseDepartment of Child Neurology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Kristina CasteelsDepartment of Child Neurology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Barbara LommersDepartment of Quality Improvement, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Jo VandersmissenDepartment of Quality Improvement, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Johan Van EldereDepartment of Quality Improvement, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Chris Van GeetDepartment of Child Neurology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Kris VanhaechtInstitute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recently developed Child HCAHPS provides a standard to measure US hospitals' performance on pediatric inpatient experiences of care. We field-tested Child HCAHPS in Belgium to instigate international comparison. In the development stage, forward/backward translation was conducted and patients assessed content validity index as excellent. The draft Flemish Child HCAHPS included 63 items: 38 items for five topics hypothesized to be similar to those proposed in the US (communication with parent, communication with child, attention to safety and comfort, hospital environment, and global rating), 10 screeners, a 14-item demographic and descriptive section, and one open-ended item. A 6-week pilot test was subsequently performed in three pediatric wards (general ward, hematology and oncology ward, infant and toddler ward) at a JCI-accredited university hospital. An overall response rate of 90.99% (303/333) was achieved and was consistent across wards. Confirmatory factor analysis largely confirmed the configuration of the proposed composites. Composite and single-item measures related well to patients' global rating of the hospital. Interpretation of different patient experiences across types of wards merits further investigation.

conclusionChild HCAHPS provides an opportunity for systematic and cross-national assessment of pediatric inpatient experiences. Sharing and implementing international best practices are the next logical step. What is Known: • Patient experience surveys are increasingly used to reflect on the quality, safety, and centeredness of patient care. • While adult inpatient experience surveys are routinely used across countries around the world, the measurement of pediatric inpatient experiences is a young field of research that is essential to reflect on family-centered care. What is New: • We demonstrate that the US-developed Child HCAHPS provides an opportunity for international benchmarking of pediatric inpatient experiences with care through parents and guardians. • Our study findings show considerable variation in experiences for types of pediatric services. Support to share good practices and launch quality improvement initiatives can be obtained by organizing regular two-way feedback sessions with clinicians to place the findings in context.

Indexed as

HospitalizationPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPatient SatisfactionAdolescentBelgiumChildChild, PreschoolFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHospitals, UniversityHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLogistic ModelsMalePediatricsChildHealthcareInpatientsPatient satisfactionQuality assuranceReproducibility of resultsSurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.