Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28540419›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2017

Therapy assessment in prostate cancer using choline and PSMA PET/CT.

Francesco Ceci, Ken Herrmann, Boris Hadaschik, Paolo Castellucci, Stefano Fanti

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Molecular imaging and biology · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. E-PSMA: the EANM standardized reporting guidelines v1.0 for PSMA-PET.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Article
  6. Combination ofCancer management and research · 2021
    Article
  7. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2020
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Determination of split renal function by PSMA imaging: comparison ofAmerican journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2020
    Article
  10. Review
  11. [EJNMMI research · 2019
    Article
  12. Pseudoprogression on PSMA PET imaging of a mCRPC patient under anti-PD1 treatment.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019
    Article
  13. The influence of PSA flare in mCRPC patients treated with alpha-emitting radiopharmaceuticals.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2018
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Uptake of Radium-223 Dichloride and Early [Molecular imaging and biology · 2018
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Liver metastases from prostate cancer at 11C-Choline PET/CT: a multicenter, retrospective analysis.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Francesco CeciNuclear Medicine Unit, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti, 9, 40138, Bologna, Italy. francesco.ceci3@unibo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9785-5248
Ken HerrmannDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Boris HadaschikDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Paolo CastellucciNuclear Medicine Unit, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti, 9, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Stefano FantiNuclear Medicine Unit, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti, 9, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
IRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola · ITEssen University Hospital · DEUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While PET with non-FDG tracers (mainly choline and Ga-PSMA) has commonly been used for restaging in men with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer, as well as for primary staging, it is only recently that a few preliminary studies have addressed the possible use of PET for monitoring the response to systemic therapy of metastatic disease, especially innovative treatments such as abiraterone and enzalutamide. This article aims to evaluate the role of PET imaging with different non-FDG radiotracers for assessment of therapy in advanced prostate cancer patients.

Indexed as

CholineAntigens, SurfaceGlutamate Carboxypeptidase IIHumansMalePositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyProstatic NeoplasmsRadioactive TracersAntigens, SurfaceCholineFOLH1 protein, humanGlutamate Carboxypeptidase IIRadioactive TracersCholinemCRPCPet/CtProstate cancerPSMATherapy assessment

Identifiers

PMID28540419
OpenAlexW2619800576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.