ArticleInternational orthopaedics2017
Incidence of osteosynthesis of members in France.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- ANALYSIS OF 45,507 SURGICAL TREATMENT OF DISTAL TIBIA AND MALLEOLAR FRACTURES OVER 14 YEARS.Acta ortopedica brasileira · 2023Article
- Collecting data on fractures: a review of epidemiological studies on orthopaedic traumatology and the Chinese experience in large volume databases.International orthopaedics · 2022Review
- Addressing the Needs of the Rapidly Aging Society through the Development of Multifunctional Bioactive Coatings for Orthopedic Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Effect of reduction quality on post-operative outcomes in 31-A2 intertrochanteric fractures following intramedullary fixation: a retrospective study based on computerised tomography findings.International orthopaedics · 2019Article
- Antibacterial coating of implants: are we missing something?Bone & joint research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeLittle data is available on the number of osteosynthesis of limbs in a country. Incidence of osteosynthesis is an essential element for the formation and organization of care. Based on the data from the work of the Hospital Information Technology Agency ( http://www.atih.sante.fr/ ) and available in open access, we wanted to know the incidence of the number of osteosynthesis performed in France and their evolution over ten years between 2006 and 2015.
methodsThe data analyzed are derived from the website of the technical agency of information on the hospitalization (ATIH). RESULTS AND
conclusionsIn France, in 2015, 267,999 limb osteosyntheses were performed. Between 2006 and 2015, the number of osteosynthesis increased by 9.1%. The incidence of limb osteosynthesis is 403.7 per 100,000 people, rising 3.9% between 2006 and 2015. In comparison, the incidence of hip prostheses increased by 12.6%, knee prosthesis by 57.4%. The main bias of the study is of course the quality of the coding of the surgeons and the establishments, a type of fracture that can enter into one or several categories of acts. In ten years, the incidence of osteosynthesis has increased little in France. The evolution is more pronounced on fractures affecting mainly the elderly, fracture of the upper end of the femur, fracture of the distal end of the radius and fracture of the ankle. The incidence of many acts of osteosynthesis is very low and therefore responsible for a weak experience for most surgeons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.