Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28540369›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanotechnology and nanomedicine2016

Nanoparticles for Effective Combination Therapy of Cancer.

Rahul Jadia, Cody Scandore, Prakash Rai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanotechnology and nanomedicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Combination therapy with TiOClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Nanoparticle-Mediated Combination Therapy: Two-in-One Approach for Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  15. Nanotechnology for Cancer Therapy Based on Chemotherapy.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rahul JadiaBiomedical Engineering and Biotechnology Program, University of Massachusetts, University Avenue, Lowell, Massachusetts, US.
Cody ScandoreDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Massachusetts, University Avenue, Lowell, Massachusetts, US.
Prakash RaiBiomedical Engineering and Biotechnology Program, University of Massachusetts, University Avenue, Lowell, Massachusetts, US.

Funding

Theranostic Nanomedicine for Breast Cancer Prevention and Image-Guided TherapyR00CA153948 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL · PI RAI, PRAKASH R · 2012 to 2014
$704k
Theranostic Nanomedicine for Breast Cancer Prevention and Image-Guided TherapyK99CA153948 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI RAI, PRAKASH R · 2010 to 2011
$245k
NCI NIH HHS K99 CA153948NCI NIH HHS R00 CA153948
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer continues to remains a major healthcare problem across the world despite strong translational research efforts towards tackling the disease. Surgery, when possible, along with radiation and chemotherapy continue to remain the mainstay of cancer treatment. Novel targeted therapies or biologics and immunotherapies have recently been approved to improve treatment efficacies while reducing collateral damage to normal, non-cancerous tissues. Combination therapies have shown better results than individual monotherapies in the clinic but often the improvements in therapeutic indices remain marginal, at best. Several combinations treatments have been clinically approved for different types of cancer. Nanomedicine, the application of nanotechnology for medicine, has already made some positive impacts on the clinical care in this fight against cancer. Several nano-sized formulations of conventional chemotherapies have been clinically approved. Nanotechnology provides a novel way to deliver combination therapies with spatiotemporal control over drug release. This review explores the recent advances in nanotechnology-mediated combination treatments against cancer. Multifunctional nanomedicines for mechanism-based combination therapies are likely to deliver the right drugs to the right place at the right time for optimal treatment responses with reduced morbidity. No nanomedicine that combines two or more drugs in a single platform has been approved for clinical use yet. This is because several challenges still remain in the development of nano-combinations including but not limited to - the optimal drug ratios in these nanomedicines, control over these drug ratios over multiple batches, large scale, reproducible manufacturing of these nanomedicines and cost of these nano-combinations among others. These challenges need to be addressed soon using a multidisciplinary approach with collaborations between academia, the pharmaceutical industry and the regulatory bodies involved to ensure that nano-combination therapy delivers on its promise of better treatment outcomes while severely reducing morbidity thus improving the quality of life in cancer patients.

Indexed as

Biomedical NanotechnologyBiotherapeuticsChemotherapyDrug DeliveryLiposomesNanomedicineOncologyPhotodynamic TherapyPhotothermal therapyTargeted Treatments

Identifiers

PMID28540369
PMCPMC5439947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.