ArticleWorld journal of nephrology2017
Acute kidney injury from different poisonous substances.
Article in World journal of nephrology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictive value of the maximum serum creatinine value and growth rate in acute paraquat poisoning patients.Scientific reports · 2018Trial
- Predictive role of cystatin C and increased proteinuria in early assessment of acute renal toxicity in patient poisoned by nephrotoxic drugs and poisons.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2025Article
- The spatiotemporal and paradoxical roles of NRF2 in renal toxicity and kidney diseases.Redox biology · 2025Review
- Re-evaluation of l(+)-tartaric acid (E 334), sodium tartrates (E 335), potassium tartrates (E 336), potassium sodium tartrate (E 337) and calcium tartrate (E 354) as food additives.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2020Article
- Frequency of Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) among patients presenting with Organophosphate Poisoning at National Poison Control Centre, Karachi: A prospective cross-sectional survey.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
- Methanol intoxication and acute kidney injury: pathophysiological mechanisms and therapeutic approaches.Jornal brasileiro de nefrologiaReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo report our experience of acute kidney injury (AKI) developed after exposure to poisonous substance.
methodsRetrospective study where data was collected from case records of patients coming to this institute during January 1990 to May 2016. This institution is a tertiary care center for renal care in the metropolitan city of Karachi, Pakistan. History of ingested substance, symptoms on presentation, basic laboratory tests on arrival, mode of treatment and outcome were recorded from all patients and are presented here. Patients developing AKI after snake envenomation or scorpion stings are not included in this study.
resultsDuring studied period 184 cases of AKI developing after poisoning were seen at our institution. The largest group was from paraphenyline diamine poisoning comprising 135 patients, followed by methanol in 8, organophosphorus compounds in 5, paraquat in 5, copper sulphate in 5, tartaric acid in 4, phenobarbitone in 3 and benzodiazipines, datura, rat killer, fish gall bladder, arsenic, boiler water, ammonium dichromate, acetic acid and herbs with lesser frequency. In 8 patients multiple substances were ingested in combination. Renal replacement therapy was required in 96% of patients. Complete recovery was seen in 72.28% patients, 20% died during acute phase of illness.
conclusionIt is important to report poisonous substances causing vital organ failure to increase awareness among general population as well as health care providers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.