ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2017
Evaluating the effect of multiple sclerosis lesions on automatic brain structure segmentation.
Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rethinking cortical hypertrophy in temporal lobe epilepsy.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2026Review
- Effect of vascular lesion preprocessing on Brain Intensity AbNormality Classification Algorithm (BIANCA) white matter hyperintensity segmentation.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2026Article
- Microstructure-informed deep learning improves thalamic atrophy segmentation and clinical associations in multiple sclerosis and related neuroimmunological diseases.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2026Article
- FastSurfer parcellation accuracy after lesion filling in moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Thalamic iron in multiple sclerosis: Waning support for the early-rise late-decline hypothesis.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2025Article
- Neuroimaging characteristics may aid in diagnosis, subtyping, and prognosis in autoimmune encephalitis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023Article
- Lesion Induced Error on Automated Measures of Brain Volume: Data From a Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury Cohort.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Article
- A fully automated pipeline for brain structure segmentation in multiple sclerosis.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2020Article
- A comparison of automated segmentation and manual tracing in estimating hippocampal volume in ischemic stroke and healthy control participants.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2019Article
- Comparing lesion segmentation methods in multiple sclerosis: Input from one manually delineated subject is sufficient for accurate lesion segmentation.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2019Article
- Validation of mean upper cervical cord area (MUCCA) measurement techniques in multiple sclerosis (MS): High reproducibility and robustness to lesions, but large software and scanner effects.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2019Article
- Brain structure segmentation in the presence of multiple sclerosis lesions.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2019Article
- Gadolinium effect on thalamus and whole brain tissue segmentation.Neuroradiology · 2018Article
- Multi-atlas Parcellation in the Presence of Lesions: Application to Multiple Sclerosis.Patch-based techniques in medical imaging : 4th international workshop, Patch-MI 2018, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2018, Granada, Spain, September 20, 2018 : proceedings. Patch-MI (Workshop) (4th : 2018 : Granada, Spain) · 2018Article
- Whole-brain atrophy assessed by proportional- versus registration-based pipelines from 3T MRI in multiple sclerosis.Brain and behavior · 2018Article
- Urgent challenges in quantification and interpretation of brain grey matter atrophy in individual MS patients using MRI.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, many automatic brain structure segmentation methods have been proposed. However, these methods are commonly tested with non-lesioned brains and the effect of lesions on their performance has not been evaluated. Here, we analyze the effect of multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions on three well-known automatic brain structure segmentation methods, namely, FreeSurfer, FIRST and multi-atlas fused by majority voting, which use learning-based, deformable and atlas-based strategies, respectively. To perform a quantitative analysis, 100 synthetic images of MS patients with a total of 2174 lesions are simulated on two public databases with available brain structure ground truth information (IBSR18 and MICCAI'12). The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) differences and the volume differences between the healthy and the simulated images are calculated for the subcortical structures and the brainstem. We observe that the three strategies are affected when lesions are present. However, the effects of the lesions do not follow the same pattern; the lesions either make the segmentation method underperform or surprisingly augment the segmentation accuracy. The obtained results show that FreeSurfer is the method most affected by the presence of lesions, with DSC differences (generated - healthy) ranging from - 0.11 ± 0.54 to 9.65 ± 9.87, whereas FIRST tends to be the most robust method when lesions are present (- 2.40 ± 5.54 to 0.44 ± 0.94). Lesion location is not important for global strategies such as FreeSurfer or majority voting, where structure segmentation is affected wherever the lesions exist. On the other hand, FIRST is more affected when the lesions are overlaid or close to the structure of analysis. The most affected structure by the presence of lesions is the nucleus accumbens (from - 1.12 ± 2.53 to 1.32 ± 4.00 for the left hemisphere and from - 2.40 ± 5.54 to 9.65 ± 9.87 for the right hemisphere), whereas the structures that show less variation include the thalamus (from 0.03 ± 0.35 to 0.74 ± 0.89 and from - 0.48 ± 1.08 to - 0.04 ± 0.22) and the brainstem (from - 0.20 ± 0.38 to 1.03 ± 1.31). The three segmentation approaches are affected by the presence of MS lesions, which demonstrates that there exists a problem in the automatic segmentation methods of the deep gray matter (DGM) structures that has to be taken into account when using them as a tool to measure the disease progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.