Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28540161›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2017

Choctaw Nation Youth Sun Exposure Survey.

Dorothy A Rhoades, Martina Hawkins, Barbara Norton, Dannielle Branam, Tamela K Cannady, Justin Dvorak, Kai Ding, Ardis L Olson, Mark P Doescher

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Review on Sun Exposure and Skin Diseases.Indian journal of dermatology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Dorothy A RhoadesStephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (OUHSC), 655 Research Parkway, Room 449, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, United States.
Martina HawkinsChoctaw Nation Youth Empowerment Program, Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma, PO Box 57, Clayton, OK 74536, United States.
Barbara NortonDepartment of Family Medicine, OUHSC, FMC 2209, 900 N.E. 10th Street, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, United States.
Dannielle BranamChoctaw Nation Health Services Authority, Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma, 720 Bryan Dr., Durant, OK 74701, United States.
Tamela K CannadyChoctaw Nation Health Services Authority, Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma, Diabetes Wellness Center, One Choctaw Way, Talihina, OK 74571, United States.
Justin DvorakCollege of Public Health, OUHSC, 801 NE 13th Street, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, United States.
Kai DingCollege of Public Health, OUHSC, 801 NE 13th Street, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, United States.
Ardis L OlsonGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, HB 7450, Hanover, NH 03755, United States.
Mark P DoescherStephenson Cancer Center, Department of Family Medicine, OUHSC, 655 Research Parkway, Room 448, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, United States.
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · USOklahoma Health Care Authority · USDartmouth College · USEmpowerment Program · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence of skin cancer is rising among American Indians (AI) but the prevalence of harmful ultraviolet light (UVL) exposures among AI youth is unknown. In 2013, UVL exposures, protective behaviors, and attitudes toward tanning were assessed among 129 AI and Non-Hispanic (NHW) students in grades 8-12 in Southeastern Oklahoma. Sunburn was reported by more than half the AI students and most of the NHW students. One-third of AI students reported never using sunscreen, compared to less than one-fifth of NHW students, but racial differences were mitigated by propensity to burn. Less than 10% of students never covered their shoulders when outside. Girls, regardless of race, wore hats much less often than boys. Regardless of race or sex, more than one-fourth of students never stayed in the shade, and more than one-tenth never wore sunglasses. The prevalence of outdoor tanning did not differ by race, but more than three-fourths of girls engaged in this activity compared to less than half the boys. Indoor tanning was reported by 45% of the girls, compared to 20% of girls nationwide, with no difference by race. Nearly 10% of boys tanned indoors. Among girls, 18% reported more than ten indoor tanning sessions. Over one-quarter of participants agreed that tanning makes people look more attractive, with no significant difference by race or sex. Investigations of UVL exposures should include AI youth, who have not been represented in previous studies but whose harmful UVL exposures, including indoor tanning, may place them at risk of skin cancer.

Indexed as

AdolescentAI, American IndianIndians, North AmericanIndoor TanningNHW, Non-Hispanic WhiteSunbathingSunburnSuntanUVL, Ultraviolet Light

Identifiers

PMID28540161
PMCPMC5432681
OpenAlexW2608752198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.