Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28540071›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2017

CT angio for the evaluation of graft patency.

Davide Di Lazzaro, Federico Crusco

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03265041 (Predictors of Long Term Graft Patency After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03265041 completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Predictors of Long Term Graft Patency After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery (Multi-slice CT Coronary Angiography Study Validated by Coronary Angiography)

TypeobservationalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2018 to 2020Enrolled40ConditionsCoronary Artery DiseaseArmsmulti-slice CT coronary angiography and coronary angiography
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Coronary artery bypass graft markers: history, usage, and effects.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2020
    Review
  10. CT angiography for coronary graft assessment.Journal of thoracic disease · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Davide Di LazzaroAzienda Ospedaliera di Perugia "Ospedale Santa Maria della misericordia", S.C. di Cardiochirurgia Perugia, Italy.
Federico CruscoUSL Umbria 2 "Nuovo Ospedale San Giovanni Battista", Radiologia, Foligno, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) is the traditional method for the follow-up of graft patency in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients. Nevertheless, the advent of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) opened new perspectives for using a noninvasive, equally reliable method to study CABG patients. This review article will analyze the current feasibility of modern multi-slice MDCT, as well as its future perspectives.

Indexed as

coronary artery bypass graft (CABG)coronary artery diseaseCoronary computed tomography

Identifiers

PMID28540071
PMCPMC5422671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.