Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28540067›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2017

Utility of cardiac magnetic resonance for evaluation of mitral regurgitation prior to mitral valve surgery.

Neil K Mehta, Jiwon Kim, Jonathan Y Siden, Sara Rodriguez-Diego, Javid Alakbarli, Antonino Di Franco, Jonathan W Weinsaft

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Mitral and Tricuspid Valve Disease in Athletes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Accuracy of stroke volume measurement with phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with aortic stenosis.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Neil K MehtaDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Jiwon KimDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Jonathan Y SidenDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Sara Rodriguez-DiegoDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Javid AlakbarliDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Antonino Di FrancoDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Jonathan W WeinsaftDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Cornell University · US

Funding

CMR Myocardial Tissue Based Prediction of Ischemic MR Revascularization ResponseR01HL128278 · NHLBI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI WEINSAFT, JONATHAN W. · 2015 to 2019
$3.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL128278
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a common cause of morbidity worldwide and an accepted indication for interventional therapies which aim to reduce or resolve adverse clinical outcomes associated with MR. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) provides highly accurate means of assessing MR, including a variety of approaches that can measure MR based on quantitative flow. Additionally, CMR is widely accepted as a reference standard for cardiac chamber quantification, enabling reliable detection of subtle changes in cardiac chamber size and function so as to guide decision-making regarding timing of mitral valve directed therapies. Beyond geometric imaging, CMR enables tissue characterization of ischemia and infarction in the left ventricular (LV) myocardium as well as within the mitral valve apparatus, thus enabling identification of structural substrates for MR. This review provides an overview of established and emerging CMR approaches to measure valvular regurgitation, including relative utility of different approaches for patients with primary or secondary MR. Clinical outcomes studies are discussed with focus on data demonstrating advantages of CMR for guiding diagnosis, risk stratification, and management of patients with known or suspected MR. Comparative data is reviewed with focus on diagnostic performance of CMR in comparison to conventional assessment via echocardiography (echo). Emerging literature is reviewed concerning potential new approaches that utilize CMR tissue characterization to guide clinical decision-making in order to improve therapeutic outcomes and clinical prognosis for patients with MR.

Indexed as

cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)Mitral regurgitation (MR)mitral valve surgery

Identifiers

PMID28540067
PMCPMC5422670
OpenAlexW2606484658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.