Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28540047›Full record

ArticleSAGE open medicine2017

Clinical outcomes for the obese hospital inpatient: An observational study.

K L Fusco, H C Robertson, H Galindo, P H Hakendorf, C H Thompson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

K L FuscoDiscipline of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
H C RobertsonRoyal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
H GalindoWorkforce Health, SA Health, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
P H HakendorfClinical Epidemiology, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.
C H ThompsonDiscipline of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe prevalence of obesity presents a burden for Australian health care. The aim of this study was to determine whether severely obese hospital inpatients have worse outcomes.

methodsThis is an observational cohort study, using data from all adult patients admitted to hospital for all elective and emergency admissions of patients aged over 18 years to two large Australian urban hospitals. We measured their length of stay, intensive care unit admission rate, intensive care unit length of stay, mortality and readmission rates within 28 days of discharge and compared these outcomes in the severely obese and non-severely obese subjects using t-test or chi-square test as appropriate.

resultsBetween February 2008 and February 2012, 120,872 were admitted to hospital 193,800 times; 2701 patients were identified as severely obese (2.23%) and 118,171 patients were non-severely obese. If admitted as an emergency, severely obese patients have worse outcomes and consume more resources than other patients. These outcomes are still worse, but less so, if the obese patient is admitted as an elective patient suggesting that anticipation of any obesity-specific problems can have a beneficial effect.

conclusionUpon admission or discharge of severely obese hospital inpatients, health care plans should be even more carefully laid than usual to reduce the risk of readmission.

Indexed as

intensive care unitLength of staymortalityreadmission

Identifiers

PMID28540047
PMCPMC5433658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.