Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28540041›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science and biotechnology2017

Effects of quantitative feed restriction and sex on carcass traits, meat quality and meat lipid profile of Morada Nova lambs.

Thiago L A C de Araújo, Elzânia S Pereira, Ivone Y Mizubuti, Ana C N Campos, Marília W F Pereira, Eduardo L Heinzen, Hilton C R Magalhães, Leilson R Bezerra, Luciano P da Silva, Ronaldo L Oliveira

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science and biotechnology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Effects of yeast culture (Frontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Dietary Inclusion of Carob Pulp (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Effect of yellow sweetclover (Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Impact ofFood science & nutrition · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Thiago L A C de AraújoDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Ceara, Fortaleza, 60356001 Ceara Brazil.
Elzânia S PereiraDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Ceara, Fortaleza, 60356001 Ceara Brazil.
Ivone Y MizubutiDepartment of Animal Science, State University of Londrina, Londrina, 86051990 Paraná Brazil.
Ana C N CamposDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Ceara, Fortaleza, 60356001 Ceara Brazil.
Marília W F PereiraDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Ceara, Fortaleza, 60356001 Ceara Brazil.
Eduardo L HeinzenDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Ceara, Fortaleza, 60356001 Ceara Brazil.
Hilton C R MagalhãesLaboratory of Sensory Analysis, Agency for Agricultural Research (EMBRAPA - Tropical Agroindustry), Fortaleza, 60511110 Ceará Brazil.
Leilson R BezerraDepartment of Animal Science, Campus Professora Cinobelina Elvas, Federal University of Piauí, Bom Jesus, 64900000 Piaui Brazil.
Luciano P da SilvaDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Ceara, Fortaleza, 60356001 Ceara Brazil.
Ronaldo L OliveiraDepartment of Animal Science, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science/Federal University of Bahia, Salvador City, Bahia State 40.170-110 Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Ceará · BRBrazilian Agricultural Research Corporation · BRUniversidade Estadual de Londrina · BRUniversidade Federal da Bahia · BRUniversidade Federal do Piauí · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of feed restriction (FR) and sex on the quantitative and qualitative carcass traits of Morada Nova lambs. Thirty-five animals with an initial body weight of 14.5 ± 0.89 kg and age of 120 d were used in a completely randomized study with a 3 × 3 factorial scheme consisting of three sexes (11 entire males, 12 castrated males and 12 females) and three levels of feeding (ad libitum - AL and 30% and 60% FR).

resultsEntire males presented greater hot and cold carcass weights (

conclusionLambs of different sexes had carcasses with different quantitative traits without total influence on the chemical and physical meat characteristics. The lipid profile of the meat was less favorable to consumer health when the animals were female or submitted to 60% feed restriction.

Indexed as

Dietary restrictionFatty acidHair sheepLean meatSemi-arid condition

Identifiers

PMID28540041
PMCPMC5441044
OpenAlexW2620137989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.