Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28540008›Full record

ArticleJournal of ophthalmic & vision research

Predictors of Successful Laser Capsulotomy for Significant Posterior Capsule Opacification after Phacoemulsification.

Brijesh Takkar, Parijat Chandra, Shreyas Temkar, Ashutosh Kumar Singh, Indrish Bhatia

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ophthalmic & vision research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Brijesh TakkarDr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
Parijat ChandraDr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
Shreyas TemkarDr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
Ashutosh Kumar SinghDr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
Indrish BhatiaDr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhopal · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences Raipur · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to determine the reasons behind the failure of laser capsulotomy (LC) performed for significant posterior capsular opacification (PCO).

methodsEighty-eight eyes of 88 patients referred for LC at a tertiary care center were retrospectively analyzed. The data recorded included the cause of cataract, visual acuity, duration of PCO, location of PCO, intraocular lens (IOL) position, IOL type, and lens capsule status. These data were later analyzed for determining the requirement of high pulse energy during LC and the success rate of primary LC.

resultsThe mean age of the participants was 55.77 ± 18.60 years with 58 (65.9%) male patients. The mean duration between cataract and LC surgeries was 45.58 ± 37.33 months. Senile (

conclusionSignificant PCO is often associated with cataract caused by uveitis or trauma, and after PPV. PCO associated with trauma, sulcus placement of IOLs, and PMMA IOLs may need multiple LCs.

Indexed as

Cataract SurgeryComplicationsLaser CapsulotomyVisual Axis Opacification

Identifiers

PMID28540008
PMCPMC5423370
OpenAlexW2892361952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.