ArticleBioinformation2017
Improved Annotations of 23 Differentially Expressed Hypothetical Proteins in Methicillin Resistant S.aureus.
Article in Bioinformation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bioinformatics Approaches for Functional and Structural Annotation and Molecular Docking Study of a Hypothetical Protein From Staphylococcus aureus.BioMed research international · 2026Article
- Label-Free Proteomic Approach to Characterize Protease-Dependent and -Independent Effects of sarA Inactivation on the Staphylococcus aureus Exoproteome.Journal of proteome research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibiotic resistant Staphylococcus aureus is a major public health concern effecting millions of people annually. Medical science has documented completely untreatable S. aureus infections. These strains are appearing in the community with increasing frequency. New diagnostic and therapeutic options are needed to combat this deadly infection. Interestingly, around 50% of the proteins in S. aureus are annotated as hypothetical. Methods to select hypothetical proteins related to antibiotic resistance have been inadequate. This study uses differential gene expression to identify hypothetical proteins related to antibiotic resistant phenotype strain variations. We apply computational tools to predict physiochemical properties, cellular location, sequence-based homologs, domains, 3D modeling, active site features, and binding partners. Nine of 23 hypothetical proteins were <100 residues, unlikely to be functional proteins based on size. Of the 14 differentially expressed hypothetical proteins examined, confident predictions on function could not be made. Most identified domains had unknown functions. Six hypothetical protein models had >50% confidence over >20% residues. These findings indicate the method of hypothetical protein identification is sufficient; however, current scientific knowledge is inadequate to properly annotate these proteins. This process should be repeated regularly until entire genomes are clearly and accurately annotated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.