Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28539449›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2017

Anti-HIV-1 ADCC Antibodies following Latency Reversal and Treatment Interruption.

Wen Shi Lee, Anne B Kristensen, Thomas A Rasmussen, Martin Tolstrup, Lars Østergaard, Ole S Søgaard, Bruce D Wines, P Mark Hogarth, Arnold Reynaldi, Miles P Davenport and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. What Can Gamma Delta T Cells Contribute to an HIV Cure?Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Wen Shi LeeDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Anne B KristensenDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Thomas A RasmussenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Martin TolstrupDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Lars ØstergaardDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Ole S SøgaardDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Bruce D WinesBurnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
P Mark HogarthBurnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Arnold ReynaldiKirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Miles P DavenportKirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Sean EmeryKirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Janaki AminKirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
David A CooperKirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Virginia L KanInfectious Diseases Section, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Julie FoxGuy's and St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Henning GruellDepartment I of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Matthew S ParsonsDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Stephen J KentDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia skent@unimelb.edu.au.
University of Melbourne · AUUNSW Sydney · AUAarhus University Hospital · DKMonash University · AUSt Thomas' Hospital · GBUniversity Hospital Cologne · DEVeterans Health Administration · US

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_12023/23
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is growing interest in utilizing antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) to eliminate infected cells following reactivation from HIV-1 latency. A potential barrier is that HIV-1-specific ADCC antibodies decline in patients on long-term antiretroviral therapy (ART) and may not be sufficient to eliminate reactivated latently infected cells. It is not known whether reactivation from latency with latency-reversing agents (LRAs) could provide sufficient antigenic stimulus to boost HIV-1-specific ADCC. We found that treatment with the LRA panobinostat or a short analytical treatment interruption (ATI), 21 to 59 days, was not sufficient to stimulate an increase in ADCC-competent antibodies, despite viral rebound in all subjects who underwent the short ATI. In contrast, a longer ATI, 2 to 12 months, among subjects enrolled in the Strategies for Management of Antiretroviral Therapy (SMART) trial robustly boosted HIV-1 gp120-specific Fc receptor-binding antibodies and ADCC against HIV-1-infected cells

Indexed as

Adaptive ImmunityAntibody-Dependent Cell CytotoxicityAdultAnti-Retroviral AgentsFemaleHIV-1HIV AntibodiesHIV InfectionsHumansHydroxamic AcidsIndolesMaleMiddle AgedPanobinostatTime FactorsAnti-Retroviral AgentsHIV AntibodiesHydroxamic AcidsIndolesPanobinostatADCCanalytical treatment interruptionHIV-1 curelatencylatency-reversing agentpanobinostatSMART trial

Identifiers

PMID28539449
PMCPMC5512246
OpenAlexW2617419687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.