Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28539419›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2017

Microglia Are Irrelevant for Neuronal Degeneration and Axon Regeneration after Acute Injury.

Alexander M Hilla, Heike Diekmann, Dietmar Fischer

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 125 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
125citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

125 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 194 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The neuroimmune interface in retinal regeneration.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

65 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexander M HillaDivision of Experimental Neurology, Department of Neurology Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5694-3097
Heike DiekmannDivision of Experimental Neurology, Department of Neurology Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Dietmar FischerDivision of Experimental Neurology, Department of Neurology Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany dietmar.fischer@uni-duesseldorf.de.ORCID 0000-0002-1816-3014
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of microglia in degenerative and regenerative processes after damage of the nervous system remains ambiguous, partially due to the paucity of appropriate investigative methods. Here, we show that treatment with the pharmacological colony stimulating factor 1 receptor inhibitor PLX5622 specifically eliminated microglia in murine retinae and optic nerves with high efficiency. Interestingly, time course and extent of retinal ganglion cell (RGC) degeneration after optic nerve crush remained unaffected upon microglia depletion, although remnants of prelabeled apoptotic RGCs were not cleared from the retina in these animals. In addition, microglia depletion neither affected the induction of regeneration associated genes upon optic nerve injury nor the increased regenerative potential of RGCs upon lens injury (LI). However, although the repopulation of the optic nerve lesion site by astrocytes was significantly delayed upon microglia depletion, spontaneous and LI-induced axon regeneration were unaffected by PLX5622 treatment or peripheral macrophage depletion by clodronate liposome treatment. Only concurrent double depletion of microglia and infiltrated macrophages slightly, but significantly, compromised optic nerve regeneration. Therefore, microglia are not essentially involved in RGC degeneration or axonal regeneration after acute CNS injury.

Indexed as

Nerve RegenerationAnimalsAstrocytesAxonsFemaleLens, CrystallineMacrophagesMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMicrogliaNerve CrushNerve DegenerationOptic Nerve InjuriesReceptors, Colony-Stimulating FactorRetinaReceptors, Colony-Stimulating Factorapoptosisaxon regenerationlens injurymicroglianeuroprotectionoptic nerveretina

Identifiers

PMID28539419
PMCPMC6596505
OpenAlexW2619613367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.